Apr 30 2009

Prior to readmission, South African rugby could clearly lay claim to being the best in the world.
We had the best record of all international teams, having beaten every other international team more than they had defeated us. We were the only country to have achieved this over the All Blacks.
Over the last 17 years however, our wonderful record has become very average and we are no longer feared as we once were.
Where have we gone wrong??

Where to begin?? There are so many factors to consider.

Loftus Versfeld

*Firstly it starts with our administration.*

Nothing is done for the greater good of the game. We really need to change the structure of our administration. Get rugby people, who want to develop, promote and work for the good of the game. At the moment, it is all a political game. Provincial presidents control the game, and work for the good of their unions and not the country.

The fact that a great man like Morne Du Plessis could not handle the politics and resigned from the board of SA rugby was a tragedy. We need great manne like Morne. He’s extremely wise, a fantastic role model, and loves the game. More men like Morne would be a great start, as opposed to the provincial presidents who only want what is best for themselves. The fact they are willing to put their individual agendas and unions ahead of the greater good of the country has to stop.
It has to be Springboks first, Super 14 second, Provincial third. And national coaches should be able to work with and have a greater say over the provincial coaches.

I’d like to see a system like New Zealand where the players are centrally contracted, rather than in SA where they are contracted by the individual unions.
Whilst I can’t see this issue changing, it would be a step in the right direction and make rugby decisions much easier.

*Implement a decent coaching structure.*

We need a national director of coaching.
We need it desperately! We have some great men who could do it. Jake White, Heyneke Meyer, Nick Mallet. It’s a tragedy none of them are currently working to better SA rugby. I believe we have some of the best natural talent in the world, where we suffer is the quality of our coaches.
They need a coaching structure to work with. Too often we have a coach who has one good season, one good tournament and we believe he should get higher honours. There needs to be a system and natural order of progression – Schools/Varsity/Vodacom cup, Currie cup, Super 14, National teams, Springboks. And time!

One season does not make a man. Prove you are worthy. As much as I respect Heyneke Meyer and all he has achieved, one Super 14 title does not mean he has achieved everything. Do it again. Build on it. Create a dynasty. Like Robbie Deans did at the Crusaders. Like the Bulls did during the 80’s, Transvaal in the mid 90’s etc etc

Paul Treu is a great example of a man who has stuck to his vision, has fantastic integrity, is loved by his players and has started to reap exceptional rewards, especially given the structures he has to work within. He has worked with his squad for some time but shown that injuries, non-availability and changing personnel don’t have to be excuses for performances. He has created a winning environment and culture to the point where it now doesn’t matter who is in the squad, the opposition know it is going to take some doing to beat South Africa. An important factor in his success is that players know where they stand, what they have to do to get into his squad, and have standards to maintain and aspire to.

Conversely after 1 good season Rassie Erasmus was touted as a future Springbok coach.
Well the last 2 seasons have shown he is far far away from it. This is valuable for him, I believe he’ll be learning immensely. But then show me 3-4 consistent years at super 14 level and then go on to higher honours. Meyer went through this in the early 2000’s. Frans Ludeke is showing he has learnt from the past and may grow into a decent coach.
Ultimately these coaches need training and guidance, this is where the director of rugby comes in. I’m sure Rassie, and Naka and Loffie Eloff could use some guidance as they struggle from one loss to another.

Loftus Versfeld

*Show some confidence and develop a playing style we believe can consistently win us games.*

I would like to emphatically say, 10 man rugby is dead. Over. Gone.
It may win some Currie cup games when the opposition has its own brainless Boers who try to prove their manhood to the world and beat each other into submission. But it won’t consistently hold up in the international arena.
We have players with great skill. We simply need to back them and allow them to express themselves. I know many Springboks, coaches and critics say that South Africans love structure and need to play with structure. Structure is fine, but robots aren’t! Too often I feel we don’t read the situation well (eg an overlap in our own half), and need to read what is happening on the field better. Pieter De Villiers message of “playing the situation” springs to mind here. And like De Villiers I also believe we have to change. And until we do and get used to it, it will always be difficult.

We’ve proved over time we can play expansively.
Mallet’s Boks in 1998/99 scored heaps of great tries. Straueli’s Bok in 2002 scored the most tries in the tri-nations, Jake White’s Boks in 2004 had no problem scoring tries, and Peter De Villiers Boks at times last year looked unstoppable. It shows we know how to achieve running rugby. We don’t have to play like the Aussies or Kiwis or anyone else. We can use our own strengths and play a South African way, but simply use all 15 of our players. It gives us more strings to our bow!

*Mindset is another important factor.*

Whether we like it or not, we will play almost half our games outside South Africa.
At the moment tours are a nightmare. We should simply stop making excuses. We have to tour. Deal with it. Embrace the challenge so we can feel the exhilaration of victory. We target games and a certain number of points. Aim to win every game and get every point available on tour. When opposition teams come to South Africa, they don’t think of losing. They aim to win every game no matter how daunting.

It is obvious that most of our teams can’t wait to get back to places like Loftus, Kings Park etc where they want to play. Whilst that is understandable, The measure of a great team is being able to win anywhere. Every game is played on the same size field. You just have to adapt to conditions. It’s all in the mind.
Too often we don’t believe we can win in New Zealand. We give the Kiwis way too much respect. They are beatable.

Sanjay at Ellis Park

*Develop consistency. It’s one of the biggest problems in our rugby.*

We have a great performance and then we suck.
In the world cup we demolished England 33-0 and played fantastic rugby. Then for the remainder of the tournament we got defensive and simply did enough to win. We need to be more confident in our ability and play to it each week.

The Sharks had 2 great wins on tour this year. And then played some of the worst rugby i’ve seen against the rubble Reds.
The Bulls were great on tour against the Horrorcanes and played with awesome intensity, then the next 2 weeks they looked like a team of amateurs; making basic errors, giving away penalties and appearing lethargic. As professional players I sometimes wonder how you can train for a week and then get things to wrong!
The Lions had the beating of the Chiefs and threw it away. Then the next week they look like a bunch of pansies against the Blues. Then they were awesome against the Reds. And then disgraceful against the Farce. Where is the consistency?

How often do we see one of our teams score – building up pressure and pressure until we get the try. And then at the restart we knock the ball on or kick it out on the full allowing the opposition to capitalise and score.
How often do we see one of our teams playing at home, race out to a 20 point lead, and we think the game is won. And then next thing we let in a couple of soft tries and struggle to win the game, actually often we lose. eg Sharks v Crusaders last week. It proves we have the skill, we lack application, patience and the mindset to produce consistent performances, and put teams away when we have the chance to.

The Stormers prove this. Year after year. They have great players. Yet they can’t make it work. I believe it’s mostly a coaching problem.
It doesn’t help when the coach makes Grant his flyhalf and after 2 games discards him for De Waal. Suddenly the whole blueprint for the season’s success is changed. 2 Further weeks later he drops De Waal and brings back Grant. Later he brings back De Waal again. No wonder the players have no confidence in the game plan. Compare this to the Bulls (SA’s most successful team) who play Steyn 100% of the time at flyhalf. And in positions where there are 2 decent players, they know they are being rotated eg Chilliboy and Derrick Kuun. That is much better handling of the players.

*Believe in coloured and black players and give them opportunities. And smaller white players too.*

We use to have an advantage in the amateur era because many of our players possessed great bulk and strength developed from years in the veld and on farms. (It’s why NZ had an advantage too). Opposition teams feared our big forward packs. We intimidated them.
However with professionalism and greater gym work, other countries are able to train as much as our players do and use methods that make them more competitive. They’ve caught up and in many cases overtaken us. We now encounter packs that outweigh ours. If we stick to our subdue and dominate theory we are finding that we often come off second best. It’s embarrassing to see the Stormers scrum disintegrate, or the Bulls scrum struggle to hold their own. It’s time we use some brain with our brawn.

We need to utilise the skillful players we have.
Give everyone an opportunity. Whether we like it or not, bit strong Afrikaans guys still get more opportunities than coloureds, blacks or small white guys. The fact we could make Boks out of big, lumbering backs like De Wet Barry, Braam Van Straaten, Trevor Halstead, Gus Theron etc is shocking. None of these players are able to run and pass and create space for our outside backs.
Meanwhile we chase away some of our best players like Brent Russell. The guy was a magician. He had pace, a great step, and speed to burn. Rather than what he does not possess, look at what he does bring to the table. A Van Straaten or Barry may be solid defensively but they didn’t allow us to score many tries. However a Russell may let in 3 but score 6. At the end of the day we have to score more than the opposition!

Bryan Habana could be our country’s greatest centre.
We’ll never know because we won’t test him there (even though he started his provincial rugby there!). One bad game (and I thought he did nothing wrong in his one test as centre against Ireland), and it’s labelled never to play him there again. But meanwhile any other centre, or lock or flyhalf can have a bad game and we don’t write them off. Be fair. Apply the same rules to every player.

I heard some of the biggest load of crock last week when I heard Rassie say the Hilton Lobberts was one of his best players against the Horrorcanes. He then proceeds to bench him for the next game saying he’ll need him off the bench. With the season gone, the focus should be building for the future. Instead he puts AJ Venter into the starting lineup. A player he has been reluctant to use for most of the season. What’s the deal with that?? I hate to ask, but is it because he is black that Lobberts isn’t given a chance? It does seem to happen to many of our black and coloured guys who aren’t wingers eg Hanyani Shimange, Tim Dlulane, Solly Tybilika, Lawrence Sephaka etc

Blou Bulle

*We need to use our talent out wide more.*

I said 4 years ago that Nokwe should be a Bok. He’s the fastest winger we have with the best step. Yet nobody knows about him because he’s never given a chance. He had to move from Boland to the Cheaters because he couldn’t make the Stormers?? Give me a break. Wylie Human and Naquelevuki are better instead? Please!!!

If we could get our players to use their brains more and become more accountable we wouldn’t see some of the crap that our teams constantly dish up. For a start NZ and Aussie wingers get the ball in space and score tries. How often do we see Habana and Nokwe one on one in space? The fact that they have been able to score as many tries as they have is remarkable.

When Nokwe scored four against Australia last year he was put into space. It helped him having Adi Jacobs as his centre. Jacobs created space and Nokwe’s blistering pace did the rest. It’s a simple formula! I don’t understand why we try to complicate it.

What I usually see is our teams consistently just shovelling the ball sideways.
The Sharks, Lions and Stormers are the greatest culprits here. Going from one side of the field to the other does not constitute expansive rugby. Nor does it give opportunities to the wingers. And unfortunately it leads to our teams consistently either going out into touch, or putting through some sort of hallelujah kick praying for a miracle. We simply give the ball back to the opposition.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           What we need are players to run straight, hard, at pace and into gaps. Then allow Nokwe, Habana, Jacobs to show us their fancy sidesteps.
One of the best players i’ve seen at doing this was New Zealand’s Christian Cullen.

I saw Montgomery training in 1998, and in my opinion he had more pace and acceleration than Cullen. But we never saw him confident enough to express himself other than the 1998 tour to Europe. Cullen however backed himself every time, and whilst he ran the ball quite often, he still kicked and varied his play nicely meaning you were never sure what he was going to do. The secret to Cullen’s success (even though his positional play was nowhere near as good as Monty’s) was his ability  to always run straight, aim for the gap, use a step and get over the advantage line. By not taking a totally direct route into the opposition he gained the valuable few seconds to ensure his support always made it to him to retain possession if he was tackled.
Compare this to Jantjies who will kick the ball 9 times out of 10, and simply run straight into the opposition when he does run it. It often leads to turnover ball when he runs, so his option is to go back to kicking it.

I’ve seen many of our fullbacks (and wings and centres) with skills the equal of the world’s best, that have not delivered consistently on the world stage. Tinus Delport, Andre Snyman, Danie Van Schalkwyk, Russell Bennett, Robbie Fleck, James Small, Stefan Terblanche to name a few. Much of that comes down to the players around them and the coaching they have received.

Schoolboy rugby, Craven week and other tournaments, show we have the ability to play direct, running rugby.
What happens between there and provincial/international rugby is coaching, and fear of failure. Too often we play not to lose, rather than playing to win. The coaches play it safe, rather than backing their ability to dominate. One could see it quite evidently with the Boks under Jake White, especially at the World Cup. Try to dominate upfront first, and once dominance and a lead has been established, then throw the ball around a bit more. As we’ve found out often, if forward dominance doesn’t happen, or we go behind, we revert to conservative rugby that doesn’t get us any points. It turns into a vicious cycle.
New Zealand especially never have that problem. They always believe they will win, and always believe they have the skills to outscore the opposition. Whilst their approach at times causes them trouble and we don’t want to replicate that, but we do need their belief to back our players and our ability.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
*Back our players and the skills they possess.*

Many overseas coaches have criticised the lack of basic skills of our players, eg handling skills, being able to pass in both directions etc.
I believe much of this comes from the style of rugby we adopt, and we essentially cause our players to go backwards. The best example of this for me is JP Pietersen.
When JP came on the scene he delighted crowds with his try scoring ability. He didn’t know any different so he did what came naturally – ran and chip-kicked, and simply aimed to score tries. As he became a regular member of the Sharks, he has been coached to play for safety, doesn’t get any ball in hand opportunities with any space, and subsequently his basic skills have become very average at times. Culminating with a dramatic loss of form last year. If I was coach i’d simply let him express himself with ball in hand. My advice would be, just go out and score tries!
I liken it to telling someone like Virender Sehwag or Adam Gilchrist to play defensively and wait till they are dominating before playing any shots. (we have a similar problem with our cricketers too!)

How do you dominate with a defensive mindset? Would they be as successful trying to curb their natural instincts and natural game? I think we all know what the outcome would be.

Ellis Park

*Make sure our conditioning is up to scratch.*

All I hear is how much fitter and faster we are compared to before. How our speed tests are better than they’ve ever been.
Watching our teams over the years I can state that I don’t care what the tests say, it still isn’t good enough.
We should aim to be the fittest, strongest team at all times. When teams come to the highveld, we should have a 15 point advantage and be able to run them off the field.
Australasian teams still believe that they can run South Africans off the park by playing with width. Largely they are correct. How often do we see the ball taken through 6 or 7 phases and then we just open up a massive gap or don’t even lay a hand on someone. Or if the game starts to get quite open we can’t compete. We then start making basic errors, dropping passes etc

*In summary.*

There are a few different areas I have identified that I believe we need massive work on. It starts with getting the right structure.
A director of coaching is needed! ASAP.
Then we need some decent coaches that can follow a vision and not succumb to pressure.
If we go in with the right mindset, we can embrace the challenges we face.
We can then play direct, hard running rugby and utilise our strengths to perform with more consistent results.
I believe in SA rugby players. I love our teams, players, culture and history. But I can’t stand the fact we under perform. We have the talent to be the dominant team and country in world rugby and forge a record like we did in our glory days. We just need to be proactive, rather than reactive. Attacking rather than defensive. And believe it rather than hope for it. Go South Africa!!!

Apr 29 2009

Horrorcanes v Blues 
At home the Horrorcanes will be hard to beat, especially with the sort of form they’ve shown recently. However my picks are now starting to show desperation and I need the Horrorcanes to lose so my Bulls can get the top of the log! The Blues will be desperate and need to win this to try and get what I think is now 1 semi-final spot up for grabs (Bulls, Horrorcanes and Chiefs should get there). Blues by 8

Lions v Crusaders 
A critical game for the Crusaders who could get there courtesy of a realatively easy run home if they negotiate this. Lions have had to travel back from Perth, whilst the Crusaders will benefit from playing at altitude last week. Although the Lions get Grobbelaar and Fourie back, that won’t be enough to deal with the desperation of the Crusaders. Crusaders by 10.

Cheaters v Worrytahs 
A tough one to call. If the Cheaters team of last week or the one that beat the Sharks turns up, they’ll get home quite easily. They have the forwards to dominate the Worrytahs. Nothing flash happens out the back, but all they need to do is use Nokwe, in space and he’ll do the damage. Is there a faster winger in world rugby? I suspect not. Cheaters by 12.

Reds v Brumbies 
The Reds will be buoyant after last weeks win. This is now just a grudge match as the Brumbies won’t make it. I’m picking the Reds to finally string together 2 decent performances. Reds by 9.

Sharks v Islanders 
The Sharks are now in desperation mode. I think their wheels have fallen off, but with Pienaar and Deysel back they can resurrect their campaign. I’m not convinced but then again the Islanders look as if their bubble has burst. Sharks by 7 .

Bulls v Farce 
We just gotta negotiate these little hurdles…get us the bonus point and make sure the Horrorcanes don’t get 5 points.  Then we’ll get our Loftus semi and final as we win the title. The Farce shouldn’t pose too much of a problem if we can dominate up front and then run straight and hard in the backs as we’ve been doing. Oh and we have a little gem called Habana out wide if we get the ball out that far! Bulls by 13.

Stompers v Chiefs 
The Stompers had a win last week and have given their supporters hope they may move up the log. That means they will lose this week. The Chiefs have a home semi to play for and should have too much firepower for the Stompers. Whilst the Stompers will lose, i’m just hoping they can ensure they don’t let the Chiefs get a bonus point! Chiefs by 15.

Apr 26 2009

What a bizarre weekend! There were some major upsets and suddenly the log has changed around completely from where it was a few weeks ago. Many teams will be rueing those one or two gaes were they have completely lost the plot and potentially damaged the Super 14 aspirations of chances of home advantage come  the playoffs.

Picks 3/6

Islanders (11) v Stompers (18)
Just when you think you’ve got the Stompers figured out, they will go and do the exact opposite. I should’ve known!
Whilst they still didn’t create much, the victory can be put down to the fact they got much better territory than they have enjoyed in all their other tour matches.
It effectively takes the Islanders out of the running.

Farce (55) v Lions (14)
The Lions were brought back down to earth with a completely inept display. Injuries have hit them hard but that is still no excuse. The Farce seem to be coming right at the right time of the season but still have to travel to SA yet.

Blues (24) v Reds (31) 
What a turnaround! 19 Straight games lost on the road. They lost last week at home. Yet away from home, against all odds, the Reds smashed the Blues. It was a lucky victory as it could have elevated the Blues to second place otherwise. The Blues still remain an enigma and I think they’ll miss out and rue this game.

Horrorcanes (56) v Brumbies (7)
The Horrorcanes now move in to first spot. What an awesome display. Confidence and inspired running rugby. They will now be looking for home ground advantage come the playoffs and remain the most dangerous team in the competition. But they can often have an off day so whilst they are formidable, you always fancy your chances. The Brumbies now look to be out of it, mentally I think they’ve done their dash.

Cheaters (20) v Crusaders (13)
The Cheaters showed what determination and perseverance can do. The Crusaders had beaten all other South African teams this year, but simply could not grind out one last win. It was an important win for the Cheaters, as it severely dented the Crusaders title aspirations. I think they’ll miss out now too.

Bulls (33) v Chiefs (27)
It wasn’t always pretty but it was effective. The Bulls don’t lose often at Loftus, and the Chiefs came up short. The Bulls will be disappointed not to have gained the bonus point, but it was imperative to secure victory first at all costs. Unfortunately the Chiefs did grab their bonus point, and they may be crucial at the end of the tournament. Bulls have a couple of easier games now and must win them before setting up what could be a must win game away against the Sharks.

SUPER 14 LOG  
   
Horrorcanes 34
Bulls 33
Chiefs 32
Sharks 31
Blues 30
Farce 28
Worrytahs 28
Brumbies 27
Crusaders 27
Islanders 23
Stormers 19
Lions 19
Reds 18
Cheaters 11

Apr 24 2009

Islanders v Stompers 
The Islanders have a big pack. Stompers don’t.
Stompers have no brains or confidence
Islanders by 12

Farce v Lions 
This one was harder to pick. My heart says Lions but my head says they’ll fnd it hard to back up their win last weeek, espcially with the personnel they have lost. Farce by 9

Blues v Reds 
The Blues are running back into form, whilst the Reds have lost 19 in a row on the road. This will be 20. Blues by 23

Horrorcanes v Brumbies 
The Horrorcanes look to be peaking at the right time, whilst the Brumbies are riding on the emotion of Shawn MacKay’s death. I’m picking the Horrorcanes by 13

Cheaters v Crusaders 
The Cheaters can’t beat NZ or Australian opposition. Simple as that. Crusaders by 16

Bulls v Chiefs 
My beloved Bulls are back at Loftus, and will give me something to cheer about. They should match and dominate the Cheifs upfront and then look to dominate the Chiefs back who will be on the back foot for once. Could be a cracker of a game, Go Bulls Go! Bulls by 12.

Apr 22 2009

The 2009 British and Irish Lions squad has been named. Whilst it has a big beefy forward pack, the halfbacks, inside centre and back trio shouldn’t pose too much of a threat to the Bokke! But using our tactical nous, and getting the job done has not been a strong point his year so there is still a job to do! (Please don’t repeat 1997!)

Here is the 2009 British and Irish Lions squad

Apr 22 2009

Here is the Springbok team I would be preparing to face the British and Irish Lions:

 

15. Ludik/Kirchner

14. Jacque Fourie

13. Jacobs

12. De Villiers

11. Nokwe

10. Pienaar

9. Du Preez

8. Spies

7. Juan Smith

6. Brussouw

5. Matfield

4. Botha

3. CJ Van Der Linde

2. Smit (c)

1. Beast/Steenkamp

 

16. B Du Plessis

17. Sephaka

18. D Russouw

19. Watson/Burger

20. Vermaak

21. Butch James

22. Habana

 

I’ve picked J Fourie as the second winger because he is playing great and both Pietersen and Habana are not playing that well. I can’t decide between Ludik and Kirchener. Ludik’s got more flair, but Kirchner does the basics well

If De Villiers is injured, maybe I’d go Wynand Olivier, but he’s not a favourite of mine. We lack depth there. Maybe Francois Steyn. He can also cover fullback (nowhere else though!)

Nokwe is a star according to me and automatically gets selected.

 

Pienaar gets the flyhalf berth. Maybe Morne Steyn as backup instead of Butch James? Worth considering

Vermaak is my backup scrumhalf. He is playing well. Kockott is too unreliable and makes too many mistakes. Januarie slightly unlucky, but he’s not in the best of form

 

My loose trio is one I’d like to see. Brussouw the best opensider out of a lack of competition. Stegmann may make it in the future. Schalk has been crap this year. He and Watson would be the reserve loose forward only because I’m still not sure about Watson, and both can cover all three loose forward positions, which no one else in SA can

 

Locks pick themselves. Danie gets the backup spot over Johann Muller because he is more versatile. Handy on the bench. Andries Bekker…too much show pony not enough grunt.

 

Lack of a decent tighthead means I’d call back CJ Van Der Linde. Sephaka can cover both the loose and tighthead sides so makes the bench ahead of J Du Plessis. Sephaka has been in great form. Steenkamp has been fantastic also with a great workrate and pushes the Beast hard for a starting spot.

B Du Plessis reserve hooker, but I think Wepenaar of the Lions has been quite good also.

 

I don’t think the actual Bok team will look anywhere like that. They’ll stick with the tried and trusted. Ie Jantjies, Habana, JP Pietersen, Burger, J Du Plessis, Januarie, Kankowski.

Apr 22 2009

A weekend that saw the South African teams lose any sort of momentum and advantage they had gained from this years competition. All 5 New Zealand teams now have a chance, and the Reds are the only Aussie team that can’t make it.

It was a perfect opportunity for the Bulls and Sharks to secure home advantage for the semis. Whilst the Bulls will still make it, and possibly have to travel for a semi, the Sharks now will have a big fight just making the semis. Worryingly, they are on a downward slide when they should be starting to peak.
The Bulls return home and have the Loftus factor to lift them, and intimidate their opposition. They have done very well in returning from tours over the last 3 years, and I expect them to remain unbeaten from home on in and win the second title. Joost do it!

Picks 2/7

Blues (26) v Islanders (6)
The Islanders never got on the front foot with either field position or posession and consequently found themselves out of it after 20-30 mins.
Most alarming for me was the reffing. I have noticed in almost all games this year one side (generally a SA team too I might add) usually gets pinged a lot more than the oppostion and without it being warranted. I understand why Cowan got frustrated because Dickinson was not policing the breakdowns equally. The Blues were able to come in from all angles and disrupt any posession the Islanders had. All we want is a fair and even contest. But the Blues did deserve their victory.

Brumbies (32) v Bulls (31)
The Bulls started off badly, and were harshly dealt with when Hoiles scored, as he clearly knocked the ball on. Coming back from a 10-0 deficit, the Bulls started to play well and by 65 mins had all the momentum. Just when it looked like they only had to close the game out, the Brumbies came back. It just shows you must put the opposition away and never relax. The Bulls gave this one away.

A bit of a worry to see Habana run down, but I think he lost momentum waiting to catch the ball, so I don’t think it is the danger sign many are making it out to be.

At least now we can get back to Loftus, grab our Kaptein back, and march towards our title once more!

Horrorcanes (34) v Stompers (11)
Stompers suck. Embarrassing. Isn’t it funny how a team down on luck usually picks up heaps of injuries…
To hear Schalk say after the game they’ve been unlucky, losing 6 games by 7 or less is a joke. Wake up and smell the coffee, you never looked like winning any of them!

One of the easiest 5 points the Horrorcanes ever earnt.

Reds (20) v Lions (31)
A good game of rugby, played with pride, passion and a willingness to entertain from both sides. It was pleasing to see how hard the Lions tried, and how much the vicotry meant to them. Why don’t that put that much effort in every week?? Is it simply because they believed they could actually beat the Rubble Reds?

Worrytahs (14) v Farce (15)
I switched this one off at halftime. I thought Ref James Leckie was extremely biased against the Farce, especially at the breakdowns. And 2 legitimate tries by the Farce were disallowed. In the end justice was served. The Worrytahs look to me as if they’ll now miss out on the semis…good job.

Cheaters (10) v Chiefs (28)
The Cheaters simply believe they can beat SA teams, but not Kiwi teams. No desperation or hunger other than Juan Smith. It’s why they’ll never seriously be contenders for anything other than the bottom of the table. No consistency.

This is a Chiefs team made to look good by the opposition. Deny them the ability to run from broken play. Stick to the basics and they have no answer. Instead the Cheaters played in their own half, and did stupid things like not putting the ball out, trying to run out of their own 22. They just gifted the Chiefs opportunity after opportunity. Well they got the tackling practice they were looking for, and another demoralising loss.

Sharks (10) v Crusaders (13)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               The Sharks are overrated and the wheels have now fallen off and departed. This is a Crusaders team that is a shadow of previous versions. Their backline is poor, yet the Sharks still couldn’t breach their defence.

Steyn is a worldclass chump at flyhalf, and can’t get anything going. Jacobs is the only one who is creating anything. In the forwards no one is giving go forward, the beast tried when he came on. With Deysel back things may change. But having 2 breakaway flanks and a number 8 who doesn’t want to get his hair dirty in the tough stuff will never give quality posession. And if you then simply kick it away aimlessly and don’t know how to catch a ball you have the Sharks game plan.

Here’s another piece of advice…practice your lineouts during the week until you can get it right during a match. It helps…The Sharks will NOT win this years Super 14.

SUPER 14 LOG  
   
Chiefs 31
Sharks 31
Bulls 29
Horrorcanes 29
Blues 28
Worrytahs 28
Brumbies 27
Crusaders 26
Farce 23
Islanders 22
Lions 19
Stormers 15
Reds 13
Cheaters 7

Apr 8 2009

Blues v Lions 
Both these teams are out of the semis, and neither know how to win. Both have minimal momentum and a draw would be a fair result. The Lions have played some good rugby at times, they are simply a 60 minute team, whereas the Blues have been very ordinary for entire games. As much as the heart and belief says the Lions can do it, i’m going to go with history, home town advantage, and the fact the Lions simply can’t put teams away and win when they should. They are the best team at losing games they should win. Blues by 7

Farce v Horrorcanes 
The Farce had a big win last weekend, whilst the Horrorcanes got well beaten by the Sharks. Even though the Horrorcanes have to travel, i’m picking them to be too desperate and too strong for a Farce side that can’t really dominate any aspect of play.

Islanders v Reds 
The Reds have lost 19 in a row away from home. Islanders by 15 end of story.

Brumbies v Stompers 
The Brumbies have been through a lot over the last 2 weeks with McKay’s death. They also have to travel back from South Africa which is the only reason I am thinking about this one. The Stompers meanwhile are awful. Against the Worrytahs it took them 79 minutes to show the desperation to score a try.  And their coach was busy abusing officials. They need to take a long hard look at themselves before blaming anyone else. The fact that there is talk of cancelling the game and the Brumbies won’t train until Thursday shows their headspace is not on this game. Players also have the option of not playing. I’m picking Stompers desperation and Brumbies lack of focus to allow a Stompers win by 8.

Worrytahs v Bulls 
The Worrytahs are in a great position and a win here should almost see them able to secure a home semi. The Bulls have been derailed in the past 2 weeks. The forwards have to front up. They’ve work hard all week, it’s time to do the damage. For all us Bulls supporters, c’mon and let’s show them what we’re made of! Bulls by 10

Cheaters v Sharks 
This should be 5 points on a platter for the Sharks, but we all know the only games a South African team wants to win is against another South African team! Other than winning in 2007, the Sharks have a poor record in Bloemfontein. We also have a new Aussie ref…let’s hope he doesnt ruin it. I’m picking 5 points for the Sharks as they win by 15.

Apr 5 2009

The quality of rugby on show this year is pathetic. The amount of aimless kicking, the poor level of basic skills and the influence of referees is killing the game as a spectacle.

It was not a good weekend for South African teams, with 4 out of the 5 losing, but the NZ aand Aussie teams aren’t that far ahead of us either. Sure there has been alot of Southern Hemisphere players move north, but I blame the Elv’s firstly, and then the coaches.

The Sharks now look clear favourites for the title, and the Chiefs look to be the one team capable of stopping them.

Picks 4/6
     
Crusaders (16) v Bulls (13)
A disgraceful performance by the Bulls. They’ve now lost two in a row and given their great advantage up. A home semi now seems to be gone, just making the semis is going to be tough enough now.
Is it coindcidene that the Crusaders seem to be involved in the most boring and pathetic games? eg v Islanders, Stormers…

Both teams made too many errors, kicked aimlessly and showed a poor skill level. However the Crusaders showed greater urgency and were rewarded for this with their try which was the result of the Bulls not taking responsibility. Someone needed to stick their hand up and WANT to take the ball. Standing around waiting for someone else to take is leads to looking stupid, and that’s being nice.

I find it amazing that a team can train all week, be paid to play and then produce that sort of dribble. The Bulls at Loftus care, play with passion and don’t like to be embarrased. On the road they simply don’t care.
The errors were amazing. Fourie Du Preez dropped two balls cold. JP Nel gave away two stupid penalties (which cost points and ultimately the game), Spies dropped 2 passes, Rossouw once again showed great endeavour yet got turned in the tackle and isolated at times turning over possession. These things cost us. Why do we do it week after week? What do they do in their video sessions for crying out loud!

The match winning penalty was the result of not taking the kickoff after we drew level (and had the momentum) and then trying a short throw at the lineout. Two errors, puts us under pressure and eventually the error presented 3 points to the Crusaders. Stupid play.
These are the small things that lost us the game. Disappointingly it was there for the taking. The Crusaders are not a great team. We got dominated in possession, territory, at the breakdowns and pressure simply by taking stupid options and not playing to our strengths.

The players need to be accountable. Habana had a shocker. Matfield was annonymous, he lacked confidence in the lineout. It’s the first time i’ve seen him unsecure on his own ball. Botha was nowhere. Rossouw lacks precision. Du Preez was somewhere else. Jaco Pretorius is hopeless. JP Nel a liability. In short this team embarrased the jersey and history of a proud union. I understand where Ludicrous Ludeke is coming from saying the refs are costing them, I agree. But we need to rise above that and adapt. We are getting killed at the breakdown, and the loss of Stegmann is huge. But we need others to step up, protect the ball and get us some go forward instead of the static delivery.

To hear Matfield say he was reasonably happy with the performance is a disgrace. As much as I love Matfield, that sort of thinking gets us nowhere. I just hope we can turn it around and play with a bit of pride and passion.

Force (39) v Reds (7)
A blowout scoreline. The Reds lack precision in their helter skelter rugby, and at times they can look silly. They’ve now lost 19 in a row on the road. At least it makes our SA teams not look so bad.

Chiefs (36) v Lions (29)
The Lions showed great urgency and commitment for 60 minutes. It allowed them to lead by 19 points midway through the second half. Then they imploded. The game was there for the taking. But as all South African teams do, they played to protect their lead as opposed to going for the win and really hurting the Chiefs. This meant we gave away all possession, and the Chiefs had all the territory and possession. As the great Kitch Christie said “You can only make so many tackles” Eventually it told. Firstly a yellow card, then the opening of the floodgates.

The Lions should hang their heads in shame for they gave this game away. It highlights the problems of not holding onto possession, and trying to do something constructive with the ball. At least Jacque Fourie played well, and Louis Ludik is fantastic. Fearless and great commitment. I’d make him the Bok fullback.

Worrytahs (12) v Stormers (6)
The quality of rugby this season is shocking.Another crappy game. The Stormers are filled with stars. They need to be accountable. The Bok team should be based on form. I’d dro Burger, Jantjies, Januarie, Mujati…sack them all. Get some committed and intelligent players.

Cheaters (27) v Brumbies (40)
Pretty predictable stuff. The Brumbies are awful. That makes the Cheaters, …, I guess they don’t have a superlative for something that bad! I don’t know how the Cheaters can believe they deserved to be in this competition ahead of the Southern Spears. Did they honestly think they could win this competition?

Sharks (33) v Horrorcanes (17)
Another game down on the skill level to previous years, but full of passion and determination. The Sharks started off slowly and gradually after 20 minutes or so started to dominate posession and territory. They couldn’t find the tryline however and luckily their pressure produced 3 penalties.

The second half saw them score twice from turnover posession. You get one or two of those chances a game, and it’s the one thing the Sharks are scoring from. It’s still worrying we can’t construct much more than that, but we butchered a couple of clear chances, including Jaques Botes who only had to catch the ball.
The Sharks now move to the top of the log, and next week they play the Cheaters. Should be a gift 5 points.

SUPER 14 LOG  
   
Sharks 30
Chiefs 27
Worrytahs 27
Bulls 23
Crusaders 22
Horrorcanes 20
Islanders 18
Brumbies 18
Blues 18
Farce 17
Stormers 14
Lions 14
Reds 12
Cheaters 2

Apr 2 2009

Crusaders v Bulls 
A must win game for the Bulls to have any chance of a home semi-final. The team is much better balanced this week with Danie Rossouw moving to flank, Captain fantastic Victor Matfield returns, and our game breaker the flying Habana is back with a vengeance.

This game is more about overcoming the mental barriers rather than any physical ones. We are better than the Crusaders in almost all departments, it’s rising above the challenge and barriers of winning away from home, at Jade stadium where we have performed so poorly for so long that is key.

First time defence was awful against the Islanders, if we show the urgency required we have the lineout and scrum to trouble the Crusaders and ensure we have plenty of possession and territory to rack up the points. If we start well, a bonus point is there for the taking. Bulls by 12.

Farce v Reds 
The Reds play the more attractive rugby, but Aussie derbies always tend to be unattractive slugfests. I’m picking a tight, low scoring game with the difference to come in the form of Matt Giteau. Actually i’ve changed my mind and now i’m picking the Reds by 6.

Chiefs v Lions 
A no brainer here. Lions won’t win away from home. Chiefs are in form. Chiefs by plenty. Lions might get lucky and score 2-3 tries.

Worrytahs v Stormers 
Stomers are awful. Once again they’ve let me down and if I was Springbok coach i’d be dropping some of the Cape Boks. Worrytahs solid but unspectacular, but they get the job done. They’ll get this one by 10.

Cheaters v Brumbies 
I still think the Cheaters are going to struggle to win 1 game in this competition. They’re embrassing and now get to suffer defeat in from of their home fans, if any turn up. Brumbies haven’t been good away from home, but it’s time to get the points offered on a platter. Brumbies by 12.

Sharks v Horricanes 
An important game for both teams. Horricanes look good off turnover ball. The key for the Sharks is to play it tight, using their superior forwards, and that’ll starve the Horricanes of quality posession. Then the Sharks can turn the pressure into points. Sharks by 10.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes