Springbok Player ratings:
Props
The Beast – 6
Started off like a house on fire and got the better of Phil Vickery
John Smit – 8
Led from the front superbly and held his composure well. Always gave 100 percent effort, and his influence was noted when he left the field in Durban. He is the man to take us through to Rugby World Cup 2011. Whilst he’s always willing to carry the ball up, his only fault was not making it over the advantage line often enough. But all the Bok forwards suffered that problem.
Gurthro Steenkamp – 6
Made a vital turnover towards the end of the first test. Other than that he had very few opportunities and appears to be rated behind the Beast by de Villiers. His workrate and performances in the Super 14 were superb and probably deserves a starting position over the Beast, as he had no opportunity to show us what he can do against the British and Irish Lions.
Deon Carstens – 4
Was supposed to cover both sides of the scrum for the Boks, but his best move was getting injured in the first test to allow john Smit to come back on. I’m not convinced he is the player we need in the Boks, although he did have a good Super 14.
Hookers
Bismarck du Plessis – 5
Rated by some as the best hooker in South Africa because of his powerful scrumming, strong work in the set pieces and all round strength and ability. Whilst he can be great on his day, he had a quiet series and once again his poor discipline let the side down when he got frustrated in the third test. If we had a decent tighthead I’d move Smit back to hooker.
Chiliboy Ralepelle - 4
Clearly not the second best hooker in the country. Sure he has talent, but I am yet to see what his exceptional qualities are as he doesn’t dominate scrums, his lineout throwing is average and his work around the park is good, but doesn’t stand out. I’d have rated Derick Kuun as our second best hooker.
Locks
Bakkies Botha - 7
Once again Bakkies showed how important he is to the Springboks. He is the man we look to lead us into battle, and dominate the opposition pack. Had a solid series and was extremely unlucky to be suspended for doing nothing wrong. He is victimised, but he always seems to be in trouble! We don’t have another Bakkies anywhere, and we will need to start producing one soon, especially if Bakkies spends as much time off the field as he does on it!
Victor Matfield - 7
Whilst he didn’t do anything wrong other than 2 drop balls in the third test, Victor had a quiet series by his standards. He once again was a great, safe source of lineout ball, and did his works in the ruck. However he wasn’t visible around the field as much as he usually is, and his role in dictating the play like he does at the Bulls was missing. Like all the Bulls players was strangely subdued and I don’t think that is any coincidence.
Andries Bekker – 5
Was a revelation last year, but is not the man to replace Bakkies as he is a lightweight. Good in the air, and quick around the field, but didn’t stand out for anything in particular. Almost cost the Boks the game at Loftus with his high tackle. Wouldn’t be in my Bok squad, and now appears quite injury prone.
Danie Rousouw – 4
Not a series to remember for the big man. Made minimal impact in Durban, and lasted about 2 minutes at Loftus. Is about the only lock we have to replace Bakkies, and is a strong ball carrier. I’d make him our lock replacement and not use him as a loose forward, where he lacks the necessary pace and athleticism.
Johan Muller - 4
Called in due to a Springbok locking crisis. A tough man who gives consistent effort, but not a world class lock. Did what one would expect, but not the man for the job. A better call may have been Steven Sykes.
Steven Sykes - 5
Didn’t get enough opportunity to evaluate his worth, but may be the longer term successor to Bakkies.
Loose Forwards
Heinrich Brussow - 7
Got around the field well and took his try superbly in the first test. Didn’t make any turnovers in the first test however he made some vital ones to help South Africa get back in the game at Loftus. At Ellis park he was a mixed bag as he made some vital turnovers, allowed too many steals from the British and Irish Lions and started to lose his cool towards the end of the match. Is the only true opensider we have in our squad so we have to persist with him. Where are all our opensiders?
Juan Smith – 7
Worked tirelessly all series and has a high workrate. With ball in hand he couldn’t get over the advantage line often enough but was strong on defence. Appears to be slowing down a bit, but like the Bulls guys, doesn’t look like the same player who performs so strongly at Super 14 level.
Schalk Burger – 3
Let the side and his reputation down with his despicable action at Loftus. The effects of his eye gouging will stay with him all career, and I wouldn’t be picking him based on his current form or behaviour. Has lost speed and fitness, and doesn’t throw himself around as he did a few years ago. Lacks accuracy in all he does although he appears to still retain enormous influence in the Bok squad. Disturbing to hear Peter de Villiers say he bases 60% of his game plan around Schalk. Maybe that’s why he had no plan B?
Pierre Spies – 6
Didn’t do anything wrong, but never stood out and for a world class player that’s not quite enough. He made a few good runs, and always looked strong with ball in hand, but when the Boks are struggling, he must gets the Boks going forward. Made a try saving tackle at the end of the first half at Loftus that had a huge bearing on the series. Needs to regain the spark he exhibited at the Bulls!
Ryan Kankowski - 4
Mr Show pony got a full game at Ellis Park in the third test. Not sure where he was hiding all game but he doesn’t do enough hard work when his team is on the back foot. I also think his handling skills aren’t good enough but he never got enough chances or went looking for work to show if that aspect of his game has improved or not. Would not be in my Springbok squad.
Halfbacks
Fourie Du Preez – 5
The best scrumhalf in the world was not involved heavily enough. Is capable of dictating games and with his boot he controls field position. His kicking through the whole series was not quite spot on, many of his kicks were too long. One could argue he didn’t get enough quality ball to stamp his authority on the series, but usually he makes his own opportunities. His covering of the oppositions long kicks was spot on at Loftus and it was his running back at the opposition that got the Boks on the front foot and eventually sealed the win.
Ricky Januarie – 3
Out of form and a coaches selection. He let the side down in Durban and the criticism of his performance brought one of the strangest metaphors ever heard! Doesn’t deserve a spot ahead of Jano Vermaak.
Flyhalves
Ruan Pienaar – 6
Had a good game in Durban with his field kicking and place kicking being spot on. However he was under a lot more pressure at Loftus and failed that test dismally. Didn’t do much to dispell the opinion he blows hot or cold, but is still a tremendous talent. In the third test he played halfback, and his option taking was poor. Needs better direction, and either he or Morne Steyn need to be the Bok flyhalf for an extended period of time.
Morne Steyn - 9
Won the series for the Boks. Made a try saving tackle on Monye in the first test that went largely unnoticed. At Loftus he had a fairytale game, kicking everything from all around the park, ending with the perfectly scripted final kick from in his own half. Unfortunately in the third test he was unable to get a decent platform from his forward pack, but did his job adequately and kicked 100% once more.
Centres
Jean de Villiers – 6
Was finally able to play in an important series but had limited opportunities due to substitution and non-selection. Is one of the Bok playmakers but never given a chance to get into the game by coach Peter de Villiers. Needs to be more involved and more of our attck needs to based around him, as he takes the ball to the line strongly and creates opportunities for those around him.
Adi Jacobs – 5
Had a poor series. On defence he was found out, and I don’t subscribe to the commonly held view that his defence has always been suspect. When fully fit he deserves his place in the starting lineup, but his shoulder is quite clearly not 100%. Was a revelation last year with his ability to test defences, and that aspect of his game has been missing since his injury. Someone please get him his surgery and the sooner we can get him back fully fit!
Jacque Fourie – 8
Took his chances beautifully at Loftus when it mattered. Other than that his defence and attacking game weren’t brilliant in the first and third tests. Is a great player, but not consistent enough to be rated as world class as many columnists in South Africa do. Could take a lesson from Brian O’Driscoll in that regard. A centre pairing of Jean de Villiers and Jacque Fourie in the tri-nations will be very solid.
Wynand Olivier – 4
Played his first test since 2007 and probably played his way out of the Bok starting team for a while again. I maintain that he is a good provincial player but not international class. He just doesn’t seem to do enough. He takes the ball to the line but never seems to break through or set anyone else up. Missed vital tackles in defence during the third test, and unfortunately threw the ball that Ugo Monye intercepted.
Wings
Bryan Habana – 7
Appears to be regaining the form of 2007, and took his try superbly at Loftus. Was involved more than he has been in the past, and his defence one on one remains strong, although he came off his wing that led to the Lions try at Loftus. Needs to be playing not resting on the sideline.
JP Pietersen – 7
Still a young player with much to offer South African rugby. It was good to see JP running with ball in hand and some space in both the tests he played in, but what was more impressive is his defence. He is very solid and makes some try saving tackles. In Durban he made some front on hits, on forwards that most international wingers wouldn’t make.
Jongi Nokwe - 5
Only had the one chance and was never brought into the game. I maintain he is the quickest wing I’ve seen with a deadly step. Has the potential to be a match winner, but it not out there to simply make up the numbers, or get cold standing on the win. I’d love to see Habana and Nokwe as our wing combination, and then given space and ball to move in.
Odwa Ndungane - 6
Another player who is solid at provincial level, but not really world class. Lacks the pace of an international wing, but has a high workrate and goes looking for the ball. Can be prone to dropping the ball, but always gives 100% effort. Stole one ball in the tackle which was great work. I also think we have picked the wrong Ndungane, as Akona of the Bulls has better handling skills and is more consistent.
Fullbacks
Francois Steyn - 5
I won’t be disappointed to see Francois racing off to France, as I believe he is highly overrated. Francois showed once again that he lacks consistency. This was highlighted in his goalkicking. He strikes some kicks beautifully, whilst others he strikes light a 3rd grade club player. From the back his field kicking was poor. He had plenty of chances but generally kicked too deep, without putting any pressure on the back three of the Lions. For some reason he was moving backward in the Lions first tries at Durban and Loftus and this gave the Lions players space to create their tries. Had Francois moved forward, he’d have been able to cut down the space and may have stopped the Lions scoring those two tries.
Zane Kirchner -
The form fullback of the year in South Africa, was never in the squad early enough to make a telling contribution. Could have been the solidity at the back that the Boks needed, and his strength is that he puts up kicks and contests them. It would have been hugely unsettling to be called away from Bulls practice to the Bok squad, in the week leading up to his test debut, but I felt he performed adequately. Should be given the Bok fullback position for an extended run, as in my opinion he is a long term, world class prospect.
Coaches
Peter de Villiers - 2
Has the distinction of winning a series against the Lions, which no other coach in South Africa has achieved for a long time. However under de Villiers the Bokshave been extremely inconsistent, and he has taken a World Champion winning side and made some superstars look very average. It is disconcerting to see players that were performing at their peak capacity a month or so ago in the Super 14 suddenly struggling to hold their own. Almost all of the Bulls players have struggled in this series, which makes me believe that the coaching is the critical factor.
Great coaches get the best out of their players, and other than Australia at Ellis Park, and England at Twickenham, de Villiers has struggled to get this Bok side firing on all cylinders. Too often they look clueless, and not quite sure how to play. No gameplan seems apparent, and it is only the occasional brilliance of world class players that has ensured this Bok side has maintained a respectable record.
His public speaking and press conference ramblings are an embrassment to the team and the country, and it is high time someone made him pull his head in or resign.
Dick Muir and Gary Gold – 3
Neither the forward pack nor the backline seem to be playing to their potential, so both these guys should be booted out along with de Villiers. One can see the influence of Muir and Gold, especially in the backline where no specialist fullback was initially picked. Muir has always favoured versatility, yet hasn’t won anything of substance with his approach.
I favour a clean out of the entire coaching staff.