Sanjay's Rugby World

After 3 consecutive losses, there are the inevitable shouts of change from Springbok supporters and critics, most notably calls for the inclusion of fullback Francois Steyn.

Steyn is currently plying his trade in France for Racing Metro, and there are many rumours that the reason he is not being picked by Peter de Villiers is for a rift between the two. I don’t believe that is the case, and like de Villiers, I don’t think Steyn merits inclusion in the Springbok side.

Currently Francois Steyn sits behind at least Zane Kirchener and Gio Aplon in the pecking order.

There is no doubt that Francois Steyn is a talented individual. He possesses a monster boot, and can kick long range penalties that no one else can.

Jon Cardinelli wrote on Keo, that Peter de Villiers should swallow his pride, and that the Bok coach won’t find a better fullback than Frans Steyn between now and the 2011 World Cup

However he is not the answer to the Boks current problems. For a start there are too many weaknesses to his game. Gone are the days you can carry an individual just for their boot.

ALL ROUND GAME?

Cardinelli argues that Steyn has the all round game that the Boks require. However how often has Steyn delivered for the Boks?

He contributed with the boot in the 2007 World Cup final, and apart from the 2007 Tri-Nations match against Australia in Cape Town where his 2 drop goals helped the Boks, the indivual try against Italy in 2008, and the long range kicks against the All Blacks in Hamilton in 2009, Steyn has failed to deliver on his promise.

As a fullback defensively he is a liability. If you watch through the British and Irish Lions series in 2009, you’ll notice that Steyn was caught out of position in both the 1st and 2nd tests, caught moving backwards when he should have moved forward to tackle the ball carrier.

Zane Kirchner rarely misses a tackle (however he did get caught by Israel Dagg who stepped through 5 other Boks in Wellington), and more importantly is always in good position, takes the ball carrier effectively and is not one of those fullbacks always trying to make the desperate cover tackle in the corner because he’s been caught out.

How many tries has Steyn scored or set up for others? How often does he break the line? His game is a power game using his strength. At international level, it hasn’t created nearly enough try scoring opportunities for himself or others.

Both Kirchner and Gio Aplon can break the line and set others away. They’ve just been performing in a Bok backline that has struggled to make the most of their opportunities because they’ve been going backwards most of the game.

Both Zane Kirchner (2009 and 2010) and Gio Aplon (2010) have proven how consistent they are over the course of the Super 14 with tries, assists and match winning performances. Steyn has rarely excelled week in week out at this level. In fact he was a large factor in the Sharks losing the 2007 Super 14 final.

He played the first test of the season against Wales, and it was hardly a stand out performance.

MENTALLY WEAK

The biggest problem I have with Francois Steyn at fullback is his mental game.

He left the Sharks at the age of 22 primarily because he couldn’t handle the pressure. Sure he has a World Cup winners medal, but with so much left to achieve in the world of rugby, it doesn’t say much about his mental strength that he felt he needed to step away from the limelight.

If he really had the desire to play for the Boks he’d have stayed, and worked on his deficiencies. I’d be wary of playing him at fullback for fear of not knowing what I am likely to get. He may be world class, but then again he may give you a club level performance.

Francois Steyn has talents. He is not the answer to the Boks as a fullback but his strengths may be better utilised as an inside centre where his power could help set up the Boks attack. However until he comes back to South Africa I’d question his commitment and mental ability.

Former Wallaby and Fox Sports presenter Brendan Cannon used the Wallabies 30-13 victory over the Springboks in Brisbane to show Peter de Villiers just what he really thinks of him.

In the week leading up to the test match at Suncorp Stadium, the Fox Sports commentary side were taking digs at Springbok coach Peter de Villiers, with Cannon saying, “I can’t believe that senior players like John Smit and Victor Matfield allow themselves to be controlled by this guy. He is a clown. He surely does not coach the team.”

The Boks decided that no Springbok player or member of management would speak to Fox until Cannon apologised on air.

Of course Cannon was always going to apologise (whether he meant it or not) for the sake of Fox Sports’ coverage and interviewing the Springbok side.

“I hereby wish to publicly apologise to Bok coach Peter de Villiers for comments I made about him on The Rugby Club TV programme on Wednesday evening. I am sorry if I offended him,” said Cannon on Fox Sports on Friday 23rd July.

Peter de Villiers at the Springbok press conference

He started off the questions, directed only at Springbok coach Peter de Villiers, and not the captain John Smit as he clearly had an agenda.

He asked a stressed and subdued Peter de Villiers, “Are you the right man to take the Springboks into the nest Rugby World Cup?” Cannon was clearly having a go at de Villiers, implying that he thought the Springbok coach was not the right man.

de Villiers could only reply with “You’ll have to ask my employers.”

It was an interesting set of events. Cannon was well within his rights to do so, but I don’t believe he acted with good sportsmanship, although de Villiers has not helped matters by seeking an apology for a comment that simply stated Cannon’s views. As a Springbok coach, criticism comes with the territory and de Villiers neds to be thicker skinned with those of opinions.

I just hope de Villiers will end up with the last laugh at the completion of the 2011 Rugby World Cup, but for now, Brandan Cannon is probably feeling pretty smug!

The Springboks were visibly frustrated after their 30-13 drubbing at the hands of the Wallabies at Suncorp Stadium on Saturday night.

At the post match press conference, both Peter de Villiers and John Smit were in a sombre mood, and along with Ryan Kankowski and Ruan Pienaar, there were subtle digs at Irish referee George Clancy.

“It was very disappointing. It was very tough for us in the breakdowns and I thought there were a couple of harsh decisions against us, especially on attack. They spoilt our ball, slowed it down a couple of times. I’m sure Australia will be happy with the way the breakdowns were blown in this game, but I thought the referee was harsh on us. Every time we made a mistake in the ruck, he penalised us, but when they did the same thing, they would get away with it,” said scrumhalf Ruan Pienaar.

ILL-DISCIPLINE

There was much talk before the match about how the Boks would be more disciplined and any player receiving a yellow card would be fined internally by the team.

I’m not sure what it achieved, as within the opening 2 minutes Jaque Fourie was yellow carded for a spear tackle. There were moans from the South African contingent, but I felt it was a fair call, as the tackle was dangerous and reckless.

Considering Fourie was suspended for an almost copycat tackle in last year’s Tri-Nations, you have to wonder if the players actually learn from their mistakes sometimes. At least when Quade Coooper performed a similar tackle he recieved the same punishment, and both players now have to face the SANZAR judiciary.

BJ Botha was also sin-binned for flopping over the ball, a call I felt was harsh as he was pushed over and clearly tried not to interfere with the Wallabies ball. Considering David Pocock got away with a deliberate and more cynical offence, it was a tough pill to swallow. Still, those are the types of calls that don’t seem to go your way when you are losing.

POOR REFEREEING

Earlier in the week, Springbok coach Peter de Villiers and SARU corresponded with the IRB in regards to the ‘poor’ and ‘one-sided’ refereeing they have been recieving. Once again there were calls that wer inconsistent and hurt the Springboks.

On the supersport commentary both Matthew Pearce and Bob Skinstad were frustrated with the referee, with Skinstad even saying the Boks cannot beat a side playing with 16 men!

However inequality in refereeing against the Springboks is nothing new. I personally believe that much of the prejudice against South Africa stems from the past and the political situation. Rightly or wrongly, that is simply the way it is, the Boks have and will continue to have an extra obstacle to overcome, and bleating on and on about it is not going to change it.

It didn’t cause us to lose, and it didn’t cause us to miss tackles. Although you could argue that turnovers or allowing the opposition to get ball they otherwise wouldn’t have got, puts your defence under presure when you’d perhaps be attacking instead.

I think the Springbok focus is in the wrong areas, and they should rather look towards themselves first as they have not performed to their potential.

The question has also been asked whether the use of Northern Hemisphere referees has been a factor (during the Super 14 it was all Southern Hemisphere officials). That is irrelevant in my opinion, as the Kiwis and Aussies are in exactly the same situation.

EXCUSES ARE FOR LOSER

Last year Springbok captain John Smit said “Excuses are for losers.”

We can not complain about Bakkies Botha’s suspension, Danie Rossouw’s yellow card in Wellington (he should never have even put himself in the situation of getting involved with McCaw) or Jaque Fourie’s spear tackle.

I am sure all Springbok supporters want to see the team winning again, and to do so rapidly. The only way I can see that happening is if the side takes ownership of their own performances, and is prepared to rise above whatever challenges are presented.

Champions can overcome all adversity. Champions are smart. If the referee is a factor, we need to be better than that. Limit his effect. Take him out of the equation. Become street-smart, give him no option to penalise you, and you can then control your own destiny.

For the sake of all us Springbok supporters, I hope the Boks look within as I am sure they will then rise above once more.

The Springboks on paper are littered with classy, experienced players all over the pitch. However once again as individuals and a team, they failed to deliver when it mattered most.

Springboks 13

Tries: Jaque Fourie, Guthro Steenkamp
Penalty: Morne Steyn

Wallabies 30

Tries: Drew Mitchell, Will Genia
Conversion: James O’Connor
Penalties: Matt Giteau (5), James O’ Connor

Springbok player ratings:

1. Gurtho Steenkamp – 5

The only Springbok player to have played all 480 minutes of test rugby this year. Another 100 percent effort, but without the same accuracy as previous weeks and will look forward to some much needed rest and recuperation. Rewarded for his efforts with a well-worked try.

2. John Smit (c) – 2

I’ve believed for some time Smit should lead us to the World Cup, but on the back of the last 3 weeks I would rather see Gary Botha or Tiaan Liebenberg.

Always leads from the front, but has struggled with his lineout throwing recently which once again cost points as a crucial stage of the match. Also lacking pace and effectiveness round the field. Maybe a break would freshen him up, but it’s becoming a gamble.

As evidenced with the penalty late in the game, his consulting with Victor Matfield is becoming more than advice, and he is now leaning too heavily on a more successful leader. Also has to take responsibility (along with Peter de Villiers) for yellow cards which has cost the Boks dearly.

3. BJ Botha – 4

Blotted his perfromance with an unlucky yellow card. Was industrious without making a big enough impact, although held his side of the scrum up well against Benn Robinson.

4. Danie Rossouw – 2

A forgetable performance from the big lock who has failed to bring the grunt needed to replace Bakkies Botha. A great team man who gives 100%, his accuracy holding on to the ball once again cost the Boks at crucial times, and slipped too many tackles which gave the Wallabies momentum.

5. Victor Matfield – 5

Has not been at his best recently, and unable to dominate the lineouts as we’ve come to expect.

Took good options in getting the ball wide when it was on and makes plenty of tackles, but needs help from his team-mates to dominate the areas he is selected for.

6. Schalk Burger – 6

A massive work-rate and made plenty of tackles as well as carrying the ball up. Whilst that is all one can ask of a blind side flank, Schalk needed to play more as an opensider, and whilst he tried hard, he was innefective in creating enough pressure on Australian ball to create any turnovers.

7. Ryan Kankowski – 7

The Springboks targeted a wider channel than in recent weeks, and Kankowski did his job well without ever really busting the line wide open. Needed more support on his shoulder which was sadly lacking.

8. Pierre Spies – 5

Tried to gee the side up once Fourie was sinbinned, but as a senior player needs to lead from the front more often in tight matches like this. Had one or two strong runs but needs to be more involved over the 80 minutes, and get the loose trio working better as a unit.

9. Ruan Pienaar – 6

The Boks attacking game was helped immensely by quicker delivery from Pienaar yet it was still largely inneffective. Made 1 or 2 snipes around the ruck area, but unable to link with his outside backs effectively. Also needed greater accuracy with his kicking game.

10. Morne Steyn – 6

Limited opportunity with his goal-kicking and departed early in the game for Butch James. Made 1 clean linebreak but once again the Boks couldn’t capitalise.

11. Bryan Habana – 3

Made some strong covering tackles, often when he was initally beaten. Handling has been a problem, but most worringly he exposes the defenisve line by continually coming in off his wing looking for the intercept. Living on reputation and should be replaced in my opinion.

12. Wynand Olivier – 5

Had to make a couple of crucial tackles when the Boks were exposed out wide, and had a couple of strong ball carries. Overall just hasn’t done enough to ignite the Boks attack.

13. Jaque Fourie – 2

Obviously hadn’t learnt his lesson from last year’s spear tackle, and one expects more from a senior player. Missed too many first time tackles, although had one electrifying run later in the second half.

14. Gio Aplon – 4

Limited opportunities. Made a hash of a set move in the second half as he aimlessly kicked the ball back to the Wallabies.

15. Zane Kirchner – 6

A busy night for the fullback. Many are critical of his play, but Kirchner is never going to bust a game open. He is a solid player who once again did his job, and his strength is creating opportunities for those around him, who are sadly struggling to gel as a side.

16. Chiliboy Ralepelle – 5

Did his job when he came on, but had little noticeable impact.

17. CJ van der Linde – 4

Much the same as Chiliboy.

18. Flip van der Merwe – 5

Has the ability to be the nect “Bakkies” but needs to make a greater impact with the little opportunities he is given.

19. Dewald Potgieter – 8

Ran strongly and looked to get involved as often as possible. Ran some good lines, looking to exploit holes in the Wallaby defence.

20. Francois Hougaard – 8

Brilliant. Not necessarily in terms of anything he did, but for having a go and asking questions of the Wallaby defence. Looked to clear the ball quickly, and snipe around the fringes as the Wallabies got tired. Backed himself, and that is the sort of attitude his team-mates need to exhibit. Needs to be included in the starting line-up as he is a star of the future.

21. Butch James – 4

Offered very little when he came on and needs to be more accurte with his kicking game rather than simply hoofing the ball downfield and hoping for the best.

22. Juan de Jongh – 6

Looked sharp and incisive when he came on, like Hougaard he looked to run direct and step his way through defenders. Made his tackles, although let himself down, giving away a silly penalty for pushing a player.

Peter de Villiers – 2

Has failed to deliver and tactically out manouvered by his counterpart Robbie Deans. The Boks attacking play has looked stagnant and one-dimensional compared with their Tri-Nations rivals.

The Springboks have all but surrendered their Tri-Nations crown and need to make some brave decisions looking forward to the 2011 Rugby World Cup.

Springboks 13

Tries: Jaque Fourie, Guthro Steenkamp
Penalty: Morne Steyn

Wallabies 30

Tries: Drew Mitchell, Will Genia
Conversion: James O’Connor
Penalties: Matt Giteau (5), James O’ Connor


The Springboks have not won in their last 7 attempts in Brisbane, and have yet to beat the Suncorp Stadium bogey, having never won at the ground.

At least the Boks can take solace from the fact they finally managed to score 2 tries, after having been held tryless in their previous 4 matches at Suncorp. That however is scant consolation for what was a third consecutive beating.

The Springboks were well beaten once again, and defeats by 20, 12 and now 17 points represent worrying signs for the side. Whereas in the past we’ve relied on getting back to South Africa to give us that edge, it doesn’t look forthcoming just by home ground advantage, and it represents a significant backward step to limply concede their Tri-Nations title after just 3 matches.

Poor refereeing was once again a factor in the game, but it certainly did not cost the Boks who were simply not good enough on the night.

SHODDY DEFENCE

For the third match in a row, the Springboks conceded 30+ points. You will never win matches consistently with a leaky defence (and an ineffectual attack).

There were too many missed first time tackles, even after all the work put in this week with the tackle bags.

Defence is all about attitude. It say’s little about the Springbok side that for 3 weeks they’ve missed far too many first up tackles, and conceded 10 tries (whilst only scoring 4).

On Saturday night the Wallabies out-thought and out-manourvered the Springboks by cleverly changing the direction of play, and exposing the Bok defence on the short side far too often.

It didn’t help that Bryan Habana comes out of the defensive line far too often and places his side under presure trying to cover his position. It’s okay once or twice in a game, but not almost every time as he is currently doing.

THE WALLABIES AREN’T WORLD BEATERS

The Wallabies won the game by winning the battle of the breakdown. Greater energy and enthusiasm allowed them to dictate play as they had better quality ball and with the steady stream of penalties, playing from the front.

Will Genia, Quade Cooper and the back three of Drew Mitchell, James O’Connor and Adam Ashley-Cooper were made to look like world beaters, as the Springboks failed to pitch up. Had our tight five performed as they should, I’m sure they will look rather ordinary.

Worringly, Will Genia was only returning from injury having played a game of club rugby. Whilst he admitted afterwards he was “blowing a bit,” he looked much sharper and quicker than any of the Boks.

BATTLE OF THE BREAKDOWN

The Wallabies won the battle of the breakdown quite emphatically. One of the things I noticed is that whenever the Boks were on attack (and it was a plan to attack with Kankowski and Spies wide of the ruck) they never had anyone on the ball carriers shoulder.

Half-breaks and offloads were never capitalised on, and when the ball carrier went to ground they either hung on too long, or turned the ball over as the Wallabies had the greater numbers.

I am not sure why this area is lacking in the Boks, is it lack of fitness and fatigue? (A sorry excuse even given the success of the Bulls and Stormers)

On defence, we were under pressure at the breakdown because we missed too many first-time tackles. There is no remedy for missed tackles.

THE MANNER OF DEFEAT

Whilst 3 defeats on the road is nothing new for the Boks, the manner of defeat leaves a sour taste. Even at our peak last year, our biggest winning margin during the Tri-Nations was 12.

This year our average losing margin in the Tri-Nations has been just over 16 points! That is simply unnacceptable from a Springbok side, and indicates we are not even close.

ARE THE BOK COACHES BRAVE ENOUGH?

Some brave decisions need to be made by the coaching staff.

Our tight five is not performing. Wynand Olivier is ineffectual. Bryan Habana needs to be dropped.

Francois Hougaard, Juan de Jongh and Dewald Potgieter have all shown they have a spark and deserve to be playing for the Boks. Will the selectors reward form and energy, or will they stick with the experienced mob who are failing to deliver. I’d like to remind them, “fortune favours the brave”.

Springbok Player Ratings from the test at Suncorp Stadium.

The Springboks will need to defy history to have an chance of defending their Tri-Nations title

After 2 consecutive losses to the All Blacks in New Zealand, the Springboks have travelled to Brisbane, to play the Wallabies at a venue they are yet to win at in seven attempts.

MILESTONES

The most telling statistics are the fact that the Boks have only won twice in Brisbane (1956 and 1971) and are yet to win at Suncorp Stadium.
New Zealand is the only visiting side ever to have won a test at Suncorp.

Since 1992, the Boks have managed just 4 wins in Australia, and only 3 since the Tri-Nations has started (1996) in 16 attempts.

The Boks have not recorded a try in their last 4 encounters with the Wallabies at Suncorp Stadium , yet have conceded a mammoth 131 points with an average winning margin of 27 and a half points!

For South Africa to win, history will have to be made, with a massive reversal of their recent performances.

TEAM SELECTION

Coach Peter de Villiers has spoken of changing his side to add more pace for the ‘quick field’ of Suncorp Stadium.

BJ Botha claims the tighthead spot in the merry-go-round number 3 position, whilst the loose forward trio springs the biggest surprise with Ryan Kankowski’s inclusion on the flank in place of Francois Louw as an out and out fecther is sacrified for another strong ball carrying option as de Villiers seeks to get hi side moving forward. It means Schalk Burger will have to play towards the ball, and may limit his ability to run wider as he did in Wellington.

Ruan Pienaar gets a long overdue start at scrumhalf as de Villiers seeks quicker ball for his backs.

Gio Aplon replaces the injured/suspended Jean de Villiers to add a more potent attacking threat to a stale Bok backline.

PREDICTION

The Springboks have signalled their intentions with their personnel changes, but can they turn things around in just 7 days? If they were playing the All Blacks I’d say no, the are helped by the fact this Wallaby side is young and unpredictable and not coming off strong recent form.

Had it been a typical Wallaby side, I would have said the Boks would struggle to win for sure. I still think they’ll be up against it, but the match may be determined by the opening 20 minutes.

If the Boks get a strong start as they always seek to do, they could run away with it. Conversely, if the Wallabies start well, they’ve shown they know how to put the Springboks away at this venue. Once the crowd gets behind them, the Boks could be put to the sword.

This one is too tough to call, it depends on the opening exchanges, I think the margin will be 10+ whoever wins, I’m just hoping it’s the Boks!

Springboks:

1. Gurtho Steenkamp
2. John Smit (c)
3. BJ Botha
4. Danie Rossouw
5. Victor Matfield
6. Schalk Burger
7. Ryan Kankowski
8. Pierre Spies
9. Ruan Pienaar
10. Morne Steyn
11. Bryan Habana
12. Wynand Olivier
13. Jaque Fourie
14. Gio Aplon
15. Zane Kirchner

16. Chiliboy Ralepelle
17. CJ van der Linde
18. Flip van der Merwe
19. Dewald Potgieter
20. Francois Hougaard
21. Butch James
22. Juan de Jongh

Wallabies:

1. Benn Robinson
2. Saia Fainga
3. Salesi Ma’afu
4. Dean Mumm
5. Nathan Sharpe
6. Rocky Elsom (c)
7. David Pocock
8. Richard Brown
9. Will Genia
10. Quade Cooper
11. Drew Mitchell
12. Matt Giteau
13. Rob Horne
14. James O’Connor
15. Adam Ashley-Cooper

16. Stephen Moore
17. James Slipper
18. Rob Simmons
19. Ben McCalman
20. Luke Burgess
21. Berrick Barnes
22. Kurtley Beale

The Springboks have been appalled at the standard of refereeing, believing it to be the decisive factor in their 2 opening Tri-Nations matches.

A frustrated Springbok coach Peter de Villiers

After two successive losses to the All Blacks the Springbok coaching staff have left their feelings in no doubt as to the major contributor behind the losses.

Springbok coach Peter de Villiers highlighted at Monday’s press conference who he felt was to blame. He mentioned that the Crusaders were the most penalised side in this year’s Super 14, with 96 penalties at the breakdown, with the Hurricanes the second highest offenders.

He asked how could All Black captain Richie McCaw be penalised 5 times in the test in Wellington with no further action, whilst Bakkies Botha and Danie Rossouw were yellow carded in Auckland and Wellington rspectively with their first offences?

de Villiers expressed his extreme frustration with the effect the referees are having on their matches, saying how can a side know how to play when there are inconsistencies in officiating, and no one at a higher level is prepared to give him any answers as to what the Boks are doing wrong.

A case in point in Wellington was the fact that Francois Louw was penalised early in the game for not releasing the tackled player, yet just minutes later Conrad Smith did the exact same thing that caused the ball to come out of the ruck, and the loose ruck ball was hacked ahead by Ricky Januarie before it was scooped up by Piri Weepu who set up Mils Muliaina’s try.

The Springbok coach is clearly reaching the end of his teether, and has suggested his side needs to become more street-smart. He does not favour this approach however as he said that next year the new law interpretations will be in effect and he doesn’t want his players getting into bad habits.

Whilst I agree with de Villiers, and I’ve always maintained that the South African sides are always prejudiced against by the referees, the Boks have to be better than that. It makes it hard to get any momentum going, but did it cause them to lose the game?

I’d rather see the Boks try to take control of their own destiny by rising above the adversity rather than complaining. Nothing changes, and constant whining only deflects our focus.

I also disagree with de Villiers who felt the Boks played well, and had a strong second half. The Boks were once again out-scored 2 tries to 1, and 8 tries to 2 for the series. No matter how they look at it, the side has been out-muscled, out -thought and outplayed.

The Boks can complain all they want, but ultimately the only way they’ll be successful is to adopt a more pro-active attitude and seek to control their own destiny.

Like last year in South Africa, the first two Tri-Nations test matches between South Africa and New Zealand were largely carbon copies as the All
Blacks smashed the Springboks to complete a 2-0 sweep.

Springboks 17

Tries: Danie Rossouw, Schalk Burger
Conversions: Morne Steyn (2)
Penalty: Morne Steyn

All Blacks 31

Tries: Ma’a Nonu, Mils Muliaina, Rene Ranger, Israel Dagg
Conversion: Dan Carter
Penalties: Dan Carter (2), Piri Weepu

Springbok player ratings:

1. Gurtho Steenkamp – 6

Tried galiantly, and made a few errors but cannot be faulted for effort. Let down by his team-mates.

2. John Smit (c) – 4

I’ve always thought Smit has been a strong leader, but his leadership has been lacking in the last 2 games. Victor Matfield runs the forwards and
would be a better bet to captain the side.

I’d rather Smit was honest in his appraisal of the game and say the Springboks were poor. Trying to look for positives in a 14 point defeat fools no
one. Prehaps the Boks miss Bismarck du Plessis?

3. CJ van der Linde – 3

Poor. Danie Craven said the most important player on your side is your tighthead prop. van der Linde has been shown up, not sure why de Villiers has turned to a northern hemisphere player who has shown to struggle with the pace of the game.

4. Danie Rossouw – 4

Unlucky to be yellow carded early on in the match, but should not have been involved off the ball.
Struggled to get into the game on his 50th test match after returning from the sin-bin and a forgettable occasion on such a milestone.

5. Victor Matfield – 5

Like the rest of his pack, struggled to get anything going. With such a formidable lineout, the Boks have not been playing to Matfield’s or the team’s strength. Looked extremely frustrated.

6. Schalk Burger – 6

Got better as the match wore on and his workrate stood out. Needs to be more accurate and hard-edged earlier in the game and when the game is played tighter.

7. Francois Louw – 4

Anonymous again other than a couple of runs midway during the second half. Has had no impact this Tri-Nations, and has been outplayed totally by Richie McCaw.

8. Pierre Spies – 3

Also missing in action. Had a few good runs, but makes too many errors in tight games, one of which led to a try. Looked disinterested in defence during the first half, has to add a few more strings to his bow with the 2011 Rugby World Cup in mind.

9. Ricky Januarie – 3

Brilliant in creating the offload that led to Danie Rossouw’s try. Other than that fails to control the game with either quick ball, or bringing his loose forwards into play. Needs to be discarded given his multiple opportunities.

10. Morne Steyn – 7

100% goal kicking accuracy, pity he had little front foot ball to play with, and had to make way too many tackles.

11. Bryan Habana – 4

Limited opportunities, but those he had were let down by poor handling. Also ran the wrong line when Kirchner broke in the second half.

12. Wynand Olivier – 3

Carried the ball weakly once or twice and not physical enough in the tackle. Found out at this level.

13. Jaque Fourie – 5

Wasted talent defending all day.
Play just did not run his way.

14. Jean de Villiers – 3

Hopefully won’t be played at wing again. Lacks the pace and defending skill for a top class winger.

15. Zane Kirchner – 5

Made mostakes but tried hard. Looks more comfortable at this level, has been creating chances but his side has been failing to make them count.

16. Chiliboy Ralepelle -

Not on long enough to be rated.

17. BJ Botha – 5

Solidified the scrum but not good enough in the tight loose as he struggled with the pace of the game.

18. Andries Bekker – 4

Minimal impact on the game as largely reduced to a defensive role.

19. Ryan Kankowski – 6

At least brought some enthusiasm if not accuracy to proceedings.

20. Ruan Pienaar – 5

Made errors, but at least looked to get the ball cleared quickly, showing the problem is not all the fault of the forwards.

21. Butch James -

Not used.

22. Gio Aplon – 7

Showed the value that the right attitude can make. Plays tohis strength and has a go at the defensive line, which can brings errors, but usually gets over the advantage line and the side moving forward. Unlucky not to finish off his break with a try.

The Springboks look a shadow of the side they were last year, whilst the All Blacks are on an upward curve as they put the Springboks to the sword with a 31-17 victory in Wellington.

Springboks 17

Tries: Danie Rossouw, Schalk Burger
Conversions: Morne Steyn (2)
Penalty: Morne Steyn

All Blacks 31

Tries: Ma’a Nonu, Mils Muliaina, Rene Ranger, Israel Dagg
Conversion: Dan Carter
Penalties: Dan Carter (2), Piri Weepu


The Boks were completely outplayed in all facets of the game as they produced their second loss in 2 weeks as they were bullied into submission by a motivated All Blacks side.

The All Blacks were stung last year in losing all 3 test matches to the Boks, and have shown they were hurt immensely by those results. Even a poor Super 14 has not stopped their side from collectively being single minded in their desire to hit the Boks hard and show the world who is the number 1.

What has been surprising is the downward spiral this Bok side has shown. They’ve allowed themselves to be dominated by the All Blacks, meekly surrendering their mental edge by inept performances, and seeking excuses to justify their poor performances.

Last week after the Eden park debacle, Jean de Villiers vowed the Boks would bounce back as he said, “I definitely think we’re too good to produce back-to-back performances like that.” If anything Wellington was even worse than Auckland.

At least in Auckland conditions were good. In wet conditions in Wellington, the All Blacks showed their skill levels were vastly superior as it did not stop them running the ball from all over the field and making the Bok defence look woeful.

The Boks for their part have looked one dimensional in their attacking approach. Last week John Smit said it was not the tactics that were to blame, it was the execution. He is right, although when you rely on a kick and hope strategy to attack from, it is no wonder they have rarely asked a question of the All Black defence.

The Springboks were harshly handled by referee Alain Lewis who let the All Blacks slow down the Bok ball, as evidenced by their second try to Mils Muliaina. Jaque Fourie went to ground and Conrad Smith illegally raked the ball back as he did not release the tackler. Ricky Januarie was then at fault as rather than tidy the ball up, he kicked it straight to the All Blacks who counter attacked brilliantly to score.

After the game Springbok coach Peter de Villiers said “I don’t want to discuss the officials in public, but I am frustrated at the moment. We go around the world for conferences about the laws and then I don’t understand what happens at the ground. The only thing a coach can ask for is consistency.”

However if the Springboks were brutally honest, they have failed to pitch up in their two Tri-nations encounters and that has caused their losses. If you don’t match the All Blacks physically up front, you will never win. The Boks have been smashed in the forward battle, and that has allowed the All Blacks time and space to run at them. There are only so many tackles a side can make. And if the intensity is not there on defence, you’ll struggle all day.

An 8 try to 2 drubbing in the 2 games is testament to the fact that the Boks have not asked enough questions of the All Black defence. It comes down to being man-handled at the breakdown and trying to attack from slow, static ball. It is hard to gain momentum, and the Bok attack has looked ordinary because of it.

The Springboks may not win the Tri-nations this year, as they now head to Brisbane, a venue they struggle terribly at. As much as we all hurt from these defeats, it’s not the end of the world however if we can use these matches to learn the lessons that will prepare us to win the Rugby World Cup in 2011. To do that however, the Boks need to be honest with themselves and become better, not bitter.

Springbok Player Ratings from the test in Wellington

Can the Springboks bounce back and recover from their 32-12 drubbing last week at the hands of the All Blacks?

Did the Boks simply have a bad day at the office last week in the Tri-Nations opener, or is Peter de Villiers and his side on the decline ahead of the Rugby World Cup in 2011?

The second Tri-Nations test will provide these answers and give us plenty more to think about!

Watching the sides go through their pre-match warm-up, Victor Matfield looks psyched. I’ve never seem him look so angry or so focused in his 96 prior test matches. That is a great sign.

Danie Rossouw leads the side out in his 50th test match.

1st Min – Matfield misses the kick-off and the All Blacks have the early territory and a chance to see the scrums.

4th Min – The Springboks get the first penalty, and then Danie Rossouw gets a yellow card. I think the AB’s definitely have a ploy to try and niggle the Boks…and it’s working. What a shocking decision from the ref Alain Rolland.

6th Min – All Blacks get a penalty as Francois Louw penalised for not letting the tackled player go.
Justice as Carter misses the kick.

7th Min – Try. Nonu in the corner, as Kieran Read set the play up with a strong run. Quick ball saw it shifted to the other side of the field and de Villiers had to come in as the Boks lacked numbers out wide.
Like last week the AB’s making the Boks pay with a man in the bin.
Carter misses the conversion to keep the score at 5-0.
Boks up against it.

10th Min – The AB’s are playing the game at speed, running it from everywhere. They are killing the Boks.
Thankfully we get a penalty. Have to make first time tackles…doesn’t help we only have 14.

12th Min – Try. The AB’s score another 50m effort. This time the right hand corner. What bullshit refereeing. Fourie took the ball in and the tackler never let him go, allowing him to steal the ball. Well done to the AB’s it was a great try, but where is the consistency in the reffing? The Boks were penalised for doing the same thing.
Carter misses his third kick.
All Blacks lead 10-0.

16th Min – The Springboks have some semblance of attack, and penalised for not letting go. Schalk Burger warned for coming in at the side, next time yellow. What is the ref doing???

Taking into account Hamilton last year, the AB’s have now scored 8 unanswered tries against the Boks. That’s a disgraceful statistic.

21st Min – Boks finally get some ball, and Habana can’t handle.

23rd Min – Everytime the AB’s get the ball they find space. Even when they are initally under pressure. The Boks meanwhile struggle to break the advantage line.

30th Min – Penalty to the Boks. Probably lucky as the All Blacks had an overlap out wide.
Carter drills it down the middle.
All Blacks lead 13-0. Game over?

32nd Min – Weepu was laughing at the scrum. The All Blacks look relaxed, and are enjoying it. Kirchner saved an almost dire situation with a timely intercept.

36th Min – Rene Ranger didn’t use his arms in the tackle. Probably a fair enough tackle in my mind.
Although if they said he didn’t use his arms it should be a yellow card.

37th Min – Much better! Try time. Danie Rossouw stops the All Black scoring riot as Ricky Januarie set up Jean de Villiers to snipe through from the lineout, from the recycle Rossouw went over.
Morne Steyn converts and 13-7 is so much better.

40th Min – All Blacks win a penalty as they get to the breakdown in numbers. The Boks look slow, static and are getting bullied.
Carter misses his 4th kick of the half, otherwise the damage would be shocking.

Half Time – Springboks 7 All Blacks 13

The All Blacks have bossed and bullied the Boks. Each of their players have had strong performances, whereas the Bok loose trio, and midfield are largely anonymous.

The Boks only use the kick and chase and are getting slow, static ball that struggles to break the advantage line, whereas the All Blacks are being rewarded for running at speed, recycling quickly and that is finding massive holes in the bok defence.

It’s all mental from here. The Boks need to step up. Up the intensity, accuracy and the desire to compete at the highest level. I know they can do it, they just look unlikely at this stage.

BJ Botha on for CJ van der Linde, and Gio Aplon on for Jean de Villiers.

41st Min – Aplon immediately runs a ball back, and breaks the advantage line. Good boy. That’s a better attitude.

43rd Min – Cynical foul from McCaw 2m from his line. Send him off! Boks earn the penalty when a try was looming.
Morne Steyn narrows the gap and now we have a ball game. All Blacks lead 13-10.

45th Min – We are going to the TMO as Rene Ranger goes in at the corner.
The try is awarded and the score is now 18-10. All came as a poor kick from Januarie gave Muliaina too much space and he got the All Blacks over the advantage line.
Carter has another tough kick and pushes it wide.
Score 18-10.

50th Min – Boks penalised for holding on. What about the tackler(s) letting go??
Weepu replaces Carter as kicker. He knows the ground let’s see what he can do.
Weepu kicks it well. Score now 21-10.

54th Min – Andries Bekker on for Danie Rossouw, and Ruan Pienaar on for Ricky Januarie.
They need to be special!

56th Min – Pienaar’s first move is to kick the ball into touch on the full. Oh dear.

58th Min – Bok attack finally breaks down. The problem is the recycles are too slow and we have to start from a static position each time. All Black defence is solid.

60th Min – Better pressure at the scrum as the Boks turn the ball over. Now we have a scrum on the All Black 22m line.
It’s now or never.

61st Min – Aplon almost through for the try. A series of recycles, but the Boks just can’t score.
All Blacks get an official warning. I guess McCaw’s previous warning was unofficial.

Boks kick to the corner and can’t score. McCaw leads the All Black counter rucking that was superb.

63rd Min – Solid All Blacks defence, although I feel they haven’t been rolling away quick enough.
Sam Whitelock on for Tom Donnelly, and Jimmy Cowan for Piri Weepu and Israel Dagg for Rene Ranger. I wouldn’t have taken Weepu off.

65th Min – Try! Israel Dagg scores in the left hand corner. Shakes off 4 tackles. At least I think they were trying to tackle. Spies, Burger, Aplon, Kirchner…non-existent.
Game over.
Carter kicks it
All Blacks lead 28-10. Bonus point try for the All Blacks.

69th Min – This is a disgrace. Kirchner tackles high, although Cory Jane slipped into it. Could be a citing for that I feel.
Carter with the penalty makes it 31-10.

Ryan Kankowski on for Pierre Spies.

72nd Min – A great back from Kirchner, but he had no support.
It breaks down and the All Blacks win a penalty.

Aaron Cruden on for Ma’a Nonu as the All Blacks can do whatever they want now.

74th Min – Schalk Burger scores. All too late however.
Morne Steyn on song with the conversion to add some respecatability. Not sure they deserve it.
Score 31-17.

Chiliboy Ralepelle on for captain John Smit. Liam Messam is on for Richie McCaw.

Full Time – Springboks 17 All Blacks 31

Well done to the All Blacks who thoroughly deserved their victory as they clearly outplayed the Springboks.
Questions were answered for the Boks, and the question now is where too from here?

After being posed many questions by the All Blacks in last weekend’s Tri-Nations opener, the second match will provide us with the answers

The All Blacks showed with their 32-12 thrashing of the Springboks at Eden Park that they have taken a step up from their performances last season. They posed many questions of the Boks, and the Boks had no answers.

QUESTION AND ANSWERS

Like the Bok coaching staff, I don’t believe any change in tactics need occur, just a change in execution. I’d make some changes to the personnel, but whatever side the Boks name, they have the capacity to beat the All Blacks. It remains a question of “are they good enough?”

This test provides many questions and resultant answers that will allow the Springboks to measure just where they are at with their current side, and how we are likely to fare at next year’s Rugby World Cup to be held in New Zealand.

Is the forward pack strong enough? Are some of our second tier players good enough for test rugby (e.g Wynand Olivier, Zane Kirchner, Ricky Januarie, Francois Louw)? Is Ricky Januarie still able to compete at test level? Is Wynand Olivier good enough to keep out Jean de Villiers at inside centre? Are our tactics out-dated?

Peter de Villiers has shown trust in his players to fix what they created with the loss in Auckland. Like 2008 where they came back to win in Dunedin, and like the Bulls who also got smashed at Eden Park earlier this year, the Boks can bounce back.

BOKS WERE ASLEEP

Last week it emerged that the Boks had not got their physical preparation right off the field. Did it have an effect or was that an excuse?

If the Boks play to their potential, they’ll win. There is no disrespect intended to the All Blacks, but the only thing that can stop the Springboks from winning is themselves.

As legendary Springbok Os du Randt said this week, there is a tendancy for the Springboks to “fall asleep”

“Some aspects of our game can become a bit lax, sometimes it seems like we are just going through the motions. That’s maybe what happened last Saturday, so I had to speak hard to the boys, get their minds right and refresh the guys’ minds about stuff they already know. It makes no difference the number of tests you have played, every now and then you will get a wake-up call. The big challenge for management is not allowing the team to fall into that trap of complacency. South Africans have a tendency to sometimes be asleep, it happened to us in 2006 (when they were thrashed 49-0 in Brisbane). Sometimes it seems we must first be rapped over the knuckles, then we want to play!” said du Randt.

I’ve felt that after the French game the Springboks have lost their intensity with games against Italy and the Soccer World Cup being distractions. The problem is can they regain their monentum against a highly motivated New Zealand side?

TEAM SELECTION

Coach Peter de Villiers has opted for only enforced changes with the suspension to Bakkies Botha and the injury to Jannie du Plessis. Like all Bok sides, it is strong upfront, they just need to do the business.

In the backline, I am still not convinced about Wynand Olivier, and it remains to be seen whether this backline is capable of unlocking the All Black defence.

The bench has a more balanced look, although I’d have gone with Dewald Potgieter instead of Ryan Kankowski.

PREDICTION

With slight rain around, the game will be tighter than Auckland, but once again won and lost in the forward battle.

I’d like to think the Boks can turn their performance around, similar to 2008, but this time i’m not convinced it’ll happen. I hope I am proved wrong.

Boks by 6 (but only because I’ll only ever back the Boks!)

Springboks:

1. Gurtho Steenkamp
2. John Smit (c)
3. CJ van der Linde
4. Danie Rossouw
5. Victor Matfield
6. Schalk Burger
7. Francois Louw
8. Pierre Spies
9. Ricky Januarie
10. Morne Steyn
11. Bryan Habana
12. Wynand Olivier
13. Jaque Fourie
14. Jean de Villiers
15. Zane Kirchner

16. Chiliboy Ralepelle
17. BJ Botha
18. Andries Bekker
19. Ryan Kankowski
20. Ruan Pienaar
21. Butch James
22. Gio Aplon

All Backs:

1. Tony Woodcock
2. Kevin Mealamu
3. Owen Franks
4. Brad Thorn
5. Tom Donnelly
6. Jerome Kaino
7. Richie McCaw (c)
8. Kieran Read
9. Piri Weepu
10. Daniel Carter
11. Rene Ranger
12. Ma’a Nonu
13. Conrad Smith
14. Cory Jane
15. Mils Muliaina

16. Corey Flynn
17. Ben Franks
18. Sam Whitelock
19. Liam Messam
20. Jimmy Cowan
21. Aaron Cruden
22. Israel Dagg

After suffering a 20 point defeat (32-12) to the All Blacks in the first Tri-Nations test at Eden Park, can the Boks bounce back, regain their pride and defend their title?

I hate to ever think the Boks will lose, but their backs are well and truly against the wall. For the World Champions, who believe they are worthy of being ranked number 1 in the world, it was an embarrassing loss because of the manner of defeat.

Put into perspective, it’s only 1 loss, away from home at that. However the Boks had no answers to everything the All Blacks threw at them, and were out-thought, out-muscled and out-played. They’ve almost undone the entire psychological edge they gained with their 3 victories over the All Blacks last year.

As rampant as the Boks were last year, especially in the Tri-Nations against the All Blacks, their biggest victory was 12 points in the Durban test match (9 in Bloemfontein and 3 in Hamilton). The All Blacks in Auckland meanwhile produced 4 tries to zip, and a 20 point victory is massive.

It was a 20 point victory (55-35) in 1997 that sealed the fate of Carel du Plessis, and that day was regarded as one of the worst in Bok history.

What makes this occasion any different? 55-35 is no different to 32-12. 7 tries to 5 actually sounds better than 4 to 0!
The Boks now have to try and beat the All Blacks in Wellington, and then the Australians in Brisbane, both unhappy hunting grounds for the Boks. is it really that bad? After all we beat Wales, put 40 points past the French and beat the Italians.

The Welsh test was too close for comfort, The Argentinians also put 40 points on the French (putting our result into perspective), and the Italian games were way too competitive for my liking. The French result may have even lulled us into a false sense of security as my same concerns have been evident over the past 5 games.

1. I don’t believe we have selected wisely.
2. We have not put together an 80 minute effort
3. We have produced too many errors such as knock-ons, forward passes etc
4. We have not been able to construct many tries.

These issues are all related to one another. Naas Botha commented before the game that the Boks are almost a complete side, and he believes they only have to develop their counter-attacking.

I’d disagree as I believe the Boks counter-attack well, it’s the ability to construct tries from set-pieces of stringing phases together. If you look at the French game, most of those tries were scored off turnover ball, intercepts etc. That’s fine when you are leading and you can pressure the opposition, but when you are behind as we were in Auckland, the opposition doesn’t often make the same mistakes and you are forced to have to construct your own tries to put the pressure back on them.

During the Italian series, constant errors robbed us of our momentum, and we were unable to constantly sustain pressure on the opposition. I’d like to see the loose-trio take more responsibility to get us going forward, and then the centres set better targets to bring our outside backs into the game (rather than stand around looking for intercepts all the time).

I would suggest however that with our current personnel, I don’t believe it’ll get much better quickly. Peter de Villiers has his favourites, and that’s fine by me, but if you live by the sword you must die by the sword.

I have never rated Jannie du Plessis or BJ Botha, and I’d have much rather seen the 2 form tightheads in South African rugby, Werner Kruger and Brok Harris rewarded. At least they scrum well, and aren’t often penalised.

The locks and loose-trio are good, but I’d like to see the ball carrying loose forwards brought into the game more often too get the side moving forward. I believe that is the scrumhalf’s responsibility to control the direction of the side, and that is my criticism of Ricky Januarie who although he brings great physicality, doesn’t control the game or clear the ball quickly enough for those outside him.

The centre combination is another area of great debate. I don’t believe Wynand Olivier is the answer. For those that applaud his physicality, defence and attacking prowess, I don’t believe he is strong enough in all these areas to dominate at test level. It’s a concern that when Olivier is on the field, our midfield defence looks disorganised and was responsible for letting the All Blacks have way too much space to operate in.

I’d rather see Jaque Fourie paired with either Jean de Villiers or Juan de Jongh. Obviously de Villiers is only just coming back from injury, but if someone like Francois Louw is good enough to start, so is de Jongh.

And rather than play de Villiers out of position on the wing, we can inject some pace or skill with Gio Aplon or even Francois Hougaard. Actually I’d play Hougaard at scrumhalf, but doubt the selectors are even thinking of that one.

Kirchner is safe at fullback and showed in Auckland his basics are good, and he can create opportunities for those around him.

On the bench I’d opt for a more conventional split, with Dewald Potgieter covering loose forward. Butch James has had his time, I am not sure what he offers as his kicking and passing are not world class. Surely Peter Grant would’ve been a better option?

It’ll be interesting to see if Peter de Villiers makes any changes. I doubt he will, other than the necessary ones for Bakkies Botha’s suspension.

The coach had this to say after the Auckland defeat, “There’s no need to panic, it’s nothing we can’t fix. It’s not a train smash, it’s only the first game of the Tri-Nations. Now we need to stop the momentum of a great team but our destiny is in our own hands.”

Springbok captain John Smith had this to add, “The only positive from this game is that we can’t get any worse. Just losing this test will be enough motivation, we will learn from a poor defeat that was a disappointment for all of us.”

A change of personnel won’t change the attitude, commitment and intensity of the players which were lacking in Auckland; but it will make the side more complete with a more solid midfield, greater attacking prowess and the ability to out score the All Blacks, one thing we need to do to beat them!

The Springboks produced one of their worst results in many years as they were outgunned 32-12 at Eden Park by a fired up All Black side.

Most of the Boks were disappointing, few could leave with the heads held high, and ultimately the pack did not front up physically, whilst a disorganized backline contributed to the 23 missed tackles that allowed the All Blacks to run rampant in a 4 try to nil victory.

Springboks 12

Penalties: Morne Steyn (4)

All Blacks 32

Tries: Conrad Smith, Ma’a Nonu, Kieran Read, Tony Woodcock
Conversions: Dan Carter (3)
Penalties: Dan Carter (2)

Springbok player ratings:

1. Gurtho Steenkamp – 6

Did what he could but ultimately the collective effort was not good enough. Dropped a ball he wasn’t expecting late in the first half.

2. John Smit – 7

Strong around the field carrying the ball and making tackles, including a crucial one in the second half in front of his poles. Was poor throwing the ball into the lineout however which contributed to the much vaunted Springbok lineout being a fizzer.

3. Jannie du Plessis – 5

Doesn’t provide a strong right shoulder and did not make a strong impression in the tight loose.

4. Bakkies Botha – 1

One of his worst test matches.
Not sure what was going through his head prior to the game, but got held back by Jimmy Cowan in the first few minutes and then had a brain explosion as his head butt will cost his side, and his professional foul cost the Boks 10 point and meant they had to chase the game.
Will not enjoy a long break and can concentrate on the end of year tour.
Made some strong runs later in his time on the field as he obviosuly looked to make amends.

5. Victor Matfield (c) – 6

Anonymous in the lineouts as the All Blacks kept the ball away from him and John Smit couldn’t find him on the Boks’ throws. Was busy around the park making tackles and trying to organise the Boks, but that’s not his primary job.

6. Schalk Burger – 5

Industrious, and look bewildered as the game got away from the Boks. Made enough tackles, but needs to find the hard edge he once had, one that Juan Smith can produce week after week.
As a ball carrying flank he needs to go forward more often if he can’t set up play wider as he does for the Stormers.

7. Francois Louw – 4

Anonymous in his debut Tri-Nations test. The Boks made no steals and were out muscled at the breakdown, Louw’s primary role.
Is a good player however and deserves another chance to prove his worth.

8. Pierre Spies – 5

Missed a few tackles and barely a presence with ball in hand. Strong from the base of the scrum, but also needs to become a go to man to get the Boks over the advantage line when the going gets tough.

9. Ricky Januarie – 5

Brings a strong physical presence and sniped and set up the next phase well when his options were cut down.
I still believe your scrumhalf needs to clear the ball quickly, something Januarie is improving at, but still too often he waits when the ball is not presented well. Tactical kicking was better, but not pin point which gave the All Blacks room to run it back at the Boks.
I’d opt for Pienaar in the next test to clear the ball faster and give Morne Steyn more room to work with.

10. Morne Steyn – 5

Good kicking for poles, but erratic in his all round game with too many errors (e.g a missed penalty kick for touch, dropped balls).
His general play is often under-rated as he showed when he almost scored late in the first half. Was never able to get the backline going as possession was not consistently good.

11. Bryan Habana – 6

Became busier as the game went on, chasing back well as the All Blacks kicked deep into the Bok half.
Limited opportunities with ball in hand.

12. Wynand Olivier – 3

Brought very little to the game in terms of getting over the advantage line or creating a presence on defence. For my mind the midfield defence looks disorganised with Olivier there, and de Villiers or de Jongh should start.

13. Jaque Fourie – 5

Minimal opportunities on attack, and like Olivier never marshalled the midfield defence which was porous at best. If he truly wants to be the world’s best centre as he states often enough, needs greater accuracy in every facet.

14. Jean de Villiers – 5

Lacks the pace for an international wing, and not used to create pressure on attack as intended. Needs to hold his defensive line and guage when to try the intercept better as a wing, although in my mind he is clearly wasted in that position.

15. Zane Kirchner – 8

A solid all round game on attack and defence. His positional play was excellent and on defence he made his tackles and took the right options when confronted with an overlap (though there was not much he could do other than take the man with the ball).
On attack he used the up and under well, ran the ball back strongly when it was on, and entered the line to create opportunities the Boks could not capitalise on.
A great platform to build on for Kirchner as he seeks to make the fullback position his own.

16. Chiliboy Ralepelle – 6

Did what he had to with limited time , but the damage had been done.

17. BJ Botha – 6

Solid at scrum time.

18. Andries Bekker – 4

Very little impact in either the lineouts or around the field.

19. Danie Rossouw – 6

Looked for work, but had a mountain to climb. Will no dobut start in Bakkies’ absence.

20. Ruan Pienaar -

Not on long enough to be rated.

21. Butch James – 3

Like Bakkies, always in trouble. Rightly or wrongly he is also a liability and not sure he can offer what Morne can at flyhalf.

22. Gio Aplon -

Not on long enough to be rated.

Coaching Staff -1

Team selection, especially in the backline came back to bite them, and they were comprehensively out through by the All Blacks brain trust who had worked out their every move.

The All Blacks easily accounted for the Springboks 32-12 in the 2010 Tri-Nations opener at Eden Park.

Springboks 12

Penalties: Morne Steyn (4)

All Blacks 32

Tries: Conrad Smith, Ma’a Nonu, Kieran Read, Tony Woodcock
Conversions: Dan Carter (3)
Penalties: Dan Carter (2)

The All Black victory was built on 2 simple principles.

1. After suffering three defeats to the Springboks last year, the All Blacks were wounded and hungry for revenge. At the national anthems and haka it was evident the Boks were not focused like they were against France and for the second Italian test. Body language gives much away, and the Boks were not intense in their pre-match formalities, whereas the All Blacks performed the haka like men possessed.

2. The Tri-Nations last year, and this years Super 14 showed the Kiwis just what sort of pattern the Boks like to play to; the question is could they comeup with an effective counter? Full credit to the All Blacks because they were well-schooled by their ex-headmaster coach and had an answer for everything the Boks would throw at them.

They had counters for the Boks strengths. They sacked the rolling maul early, and even showed in the second half they could reply in kind.

At the few lineouts they allowed to eventuate they employed measures to ensure the Boks were on the back foot. Quick throws and not allowing the lineout to form. They even stole three Bok lineouts just to rub salt into the wound. I am not sure why the Boks didn’t play to their strengths more often, and put the ball out rather than allow the All Blacks the ability to counter attack from kicks and broken play.

The All Blacks regained their once feared physicality and bossed the breakdowns (an area they come off second best last year). Much of that is technique, but the majority is attitude and commitment.

The Boks kicking (especially with Fourie du Preez gone) was innacurate and the All Blacks (similar to the Crusaders against the Bulls at Loftus) had a plan to run into spaces and gain momentum from their back three. It worked a treat, and from front ball, the All Blacks were unstoppable with their full head of steam. It takes courage to keep running, even from deep in your own half, but the All Blacks backed their ability and were duly rewarded.

A 4 try to nil scoreline is very comprehensive. The All Blacks had done their homework well, had plans for the Boks strengths, and maintained their intensity and discipline for the entire game, echoed by Kieran Read after the game who said “It was just about an 80 minute performance from us.”

After the game All Black coach Graham Henry was obviously a very pleased man and had this to say,”(it was) A very special day for those guys out there, who played superbly. The lineout was superb, well thought out and well executed.” However he showed the All Blacks won’t be complacent for the next match as he stated “We haven’t done the job yet, next week is very important.”

As a collective, the Springboks were poor with very few players enhancing their reputations. Check out the Springbok players ratings.
Whereas the All Blacks played as a team, with no poor performances.

The Springbok brains trust have much to think about. John Smit seemed in a daze after the game, trying to search for answers. He said, “Discipline costs you test matches,” frustrated with his team-mate Bakkies Botha before adding, “Obviously we didn’t front up and we’ve got a lot to work on. I was surprised at how poor we were.”

The question now is: Can the Boks bounce back?

Springbok lock and enforcer Bakkies Botha has copped a 9 week ban after being found guilty by SANZAR judicial officer Dennis Wheelahan of head butting All Black scrumhalf Jimmy Cowan following the Boks 32-12 massacre at Eden Park.

Botha was cited after Irish referee Alan Lewis missed the head butt which occurred in the opening minutes after Cowan had earlier interfered with Botha as he tried to chase a kick. Botha was obviously aggravated by this incident and in the heat of the moment lost his cool, his sense of judgement and his Springbok lock position.

Botha’s offence was deemed to be int he middle range of seriousness, and his past judicial record was also taken into account in determining his suspension. It follows a 4 week suspension earlier this year in the Super 14, a 2 week ban in last year’s international season, a further 3 week ban in last year’s Super 14 amongst others.

Botha will thus miss all the Tri-Nations matches, and can best use this period to take a long hard look at his behaviour and modify his approach in the future. I have supported Bakkies for a long time now, believing him to be past incidents such as when he eye-gouged Australian hooker Brendan Cannon in 2003.

I felt he has been unfairly victimised for playing the game hard (but legally) and copped suspensions for incidents others perform almost every game. However no one can condone a head butt, which was a cheap shot as Cowan was on the ground and it was aimed at the back of his head where he could not defend himself.

Botha, like Johan le Roux and Andre Venter in past years, took the bait as the All Blacks are past masters of knowing how to get under the skin of the Boks. It worked like a charm as Botha was lulled in hook, line and sinker, and now Botha will have to face the long reaching consequences for the rest of his career.

“I sincerely regret the incident. I have let my team, my country and family down and I have done an injustice to the Springbok jersey and what it stands for. I apologise to Jimmy Cowan and the New Zealand rugby public for what happened. Rugby is a physical sport but it has to be played within the boundaries and spirit of the law. I truly regret my actions and will make sure that I put the extended time away from the game to positive use and return to playing with the right attitude” said Botha in a statement afterwards.

Andy Marino who is SARU’s Manager of National Teams had this to say,”SARU views any incident of foul play in a very serious light. Bakkies remains an important player in Springbok rugby and I have discussed with him the extent of his actions and the implications it could have on the team, himself personally and his family.”

A 9 week ban was fairly lenient given the seriousness of the offence, and the question remains now as to how much of a liability Botha may be to the Springboks, and how many opportunities his coaches will give him in the future. I have no doubt he’ll come back better, and more focused than ever after he has missed the majority of this year and still has much to deliver for South African rugby.

Is this a preliminary World Cup Final, as the top 2 sides in the world playing at the venue for the 2011 Rugby World Cup Final?

As the first match of the 2010 Tri-Nations, this match has great significant as it sets the tone for the competition, and a win by the Springboks could set up a successful title defence.

Many questions will be answered in 80 minutes time, and there is also the extra incentive of the IRB number 1 world ranking up for grabs, as well as a significan psychological edge ahead of the Rugby World Cup in 2011.

South Africa have not won at Eden Park since 1937, albeit only 6 test matches have been played. Let’s hope history is re-written today.

Why would you place a test match in a half completed stadium? It’s not really the smartest decision is it? What do the players think looking at concrete developments as opposed to a packed stadium with their fans?

Not particularly impressed with the performance of the South African national anthem. She didn’t sound very South African! The Boks look a bit on edge so far, whilst the All Blacks looked pumped as evidenced by the performance of the haka.

2nd Min – Great intensity to start with. Bakkies Botha will be cited for a headbutt and with his track record he can kiss any further involvement in the Tri-Nations aside. Unfortunately this time he’ll deserve it.
Carter misses the penalty attempt.

4th Min – Mistakes all over the show. The intensity is enormous! The Boks just need to settle here. The loose trio need to set better targets for the Boks.
Morne Steyn narrowly misses the drop goal attempt.

7th Min – Great scrum from the Boks. Richie McCaw penalised for detaching early.
Morne Steyn gets the first points of the Vodacom Tri-Nations as the Boks get the early lead 3-0.

9th Min – Great build-up by the Boks almost brings a try as there was space on the right hand flank.

11th Min – Great break out from the AB’s. The Bok defence scrambles well as a try was butchered.
An inevitable penalty sees Bakkies Botha sin-binned for a professional foul slowing the ball at the breakdown. That’s a massive call from the ref, Alain Lewis.
Dan Carter kicks the penalty to make it 3-3.

17th Min – Boks look a bit slow and pedestrian while the AB’s are definitely trying to move the ball around and are making way too much yardage.

19th Min – Conrad Smith scores in the right hand corner as the All Blacks split the Boks straight down the middle. Shocking defence.
Carter kicks the sideline conversion to give the All Blacks a 10-3 lead.
Unlike last year, it’ll be the Boks who have to come from behind as they enjoyed playing from in front last year. I’m not so confident we can play from behind.

23rd Min – The All Blacks are creating overlaps all over the field. One of the criticisms is that Wynand Olivier doesn’t organise the midfield defence well, although I can’t see who is to blame there is way to much space in the Bok midfield.

25th Min – A 7 man, and then 8 man scrum takes a battering from the AB’s and results in a penalty. I guess the Boks were lucky not to concede a try, but Carter will have a shot at goal.
Carter slots the penalty to open a 10 point gap 13-3.

29th Min – Almost a great Bok try as they went through the phases really well. Just missed the last pass a few metres short of the AB line. It was Kirchner who started the counter attack.
A gift 3 points went begging as advantage was played. It was a good/fair call however.

35th Min – Nonu scores in the left hand corner after great build up. I think this game is all over as I don’t see the Boks coming back. I just hope we don’t get a big hiding.
Carter is kicing brilliantly to get another one from the sideline. All Blacks lead 20-3.

Half Time – Springboks 3 All Blacks 20

What a dismal first half from the Boks. Bakkies Botha has had a match to forget and has let his side down, whilst the All Blacks have shown they back themselves to run this Bok side around and are winning by creating space all over the paddock.

The Boks need to take off Wynand Olivier, move Jean de Villiers into midfield to shore up the defence and introduce and utilise some pace on the wings in Habana and Aplon. All that will be dependent on the Boks pack contesting better in all aspects of the forward exchanges however where we haven’t been able to get enough forward momentum.

At this stage though I suggest the Boks will be lucky to get within 10 by the end of the game.

41st Min – An early penalty for the Boks who still look a bit disorganised.
Morne Steyn narrows the gap to make it 20-6 and bring up 101 points in Tri-Nations as a personal milestone.

46th Min – Better play from the Boks going through phases and more importantly running onto the ball at pace.
From a penalty Morne Steyn narrows it to 20-9.

49th Min – Much better continuity from the Boks. Morne Steyn resorts to a drop goal as it broke down and it just misses narrowly.

52nd Min – The Boks look a completely different side, as they’re playing their game.
Bakkies Botha and Francois Louw make way for Andries Bekker and Danie Rossouw.
Bakkies will have a hearing to prepare for before being sent home I’m sure.

55th Min – Piri Weepu on for Jimmy Cowan as the All Blacks make their first change. Cowan has been combative and had a great game.

57th Min – Try! Kieran Read goes through a couple of tackles to charge over as the AB’s went through patient build-up. 3 Tries to nil is pretty comprehensive.
Carter is on song once again to add the extra points and now it is 27-9.

59th Min – BJ Botha on for Jannie du Plessis.
A penalty in centre field and interestingly the Boks still want to aim at poles. I’d have gone for the lineout as we are going to have to score some tries to win this one.
Morne Steyn safe with the penalty however to narrow it to 27-12.

68th Min – The AB’s physicality has paved the way for their victory.
The Springboks have looked clueless, disorganised and have been bossed in the physical exchanges. I’d also add they’ve been outhought by the AB coaching staff who have been better prepared.

71st Min – Butch James on for Morne Steyn. The Bok backline for my mind is unsettled and lacks the game breakers and stability of last year. If Peter de Villiers is not going to play Jean de Villiers at inside centre I’d rather see Juan de Jongh.
The result is now a formality, just a question of bonus points.
Chiliboy Ralepelle on for John Smit, and Gio Aplon on for Wynand Olivier as Jean de Villiers moves into the midfield.

76th Min – Ruan Pienaar on for Ricky Januarie who has actually had a decent game unlike most of his team-mates.
So far the Boks have missed 23 tackles compared to the AB’s 9.

78th Min – The All Blacks have their 4th try as once again they out muscle the Boks to just drive over the Bok pack. That’s a 4 try bonus point. Schalk Burger and Pierre Spies look lost and bewildered.
Carter finally misses one to leave the score at 32-12.

Full Time Springboks 12 All Blacks 32

What a comprehensive victory for the All Blacks!
4 Tries to zip. The Boks were out-thought, out-muscled and out-played.

The manner of defeat leaves a sour taste for all us Bok fans. Well done to the All Blacks they deserved their victory and showed they want the Tri-Nations back.

The All Blacks also now earn a firmer hold on the IRB number 1 World Ranking, giving the Springboks plenty to strive towards over the rest of their Tri-Nations campaign.

The 2010 Tri-Nations looks to me to be a two-horse race.

The Springboks will try to successfully defend their crown for the first time, whilst the All Blacks need a confidence boost after a lean period for New Zealand rugby.

Sides should be expected to win their home games, an any side that can win 1 or even two on the road, will be well on the way to winning the Tri-Nations title.

The All Blacks

The All Blacks always produce a strong side, but perhaps lack the world class players and game-breakers we’ve come to expect.

The All Black coaches juggled around their coaching specialities last year, yet have returned back to what didn’t work last year. Coupled with some unlucky/unwise selection issues, this side lacks the stability, cohesion and team spirit of sides gone by.

The All Blacks have lost their mental stronghold over the Springboks, even at home, yet luckily still have a habit of beating Australia in Australia. They can possibly afford to lose one home match against the Boks if they continue their strong run against Australia in Australia.

The All Blacks need to sort out their lineout, an area they were weak last year, if they are to compete strongly this year. Their backline will always be dangerous, especially with Daniel Carter running the ship, but needs a few more line breaks for the outside backs to show their pace and skill.

Prediction: 2nd

The Wallabies

Still seen as a World Cup favourite for many, however I’m yet to see some special performances materialise under Robbie Deans.

The Wallabies return to their canary yellow strip has not altered the fact that they lack the hard edge to compete week in and week out in test match rugby.

They have solid, grafting forwards, but no one who can consistently get them over the advantage line to set targets for their backline which always use to be their strength. The backline has talent, but apart from Matt Giteau, no one else is a consistent threat with proven try-scoring ability.

The question will be, can the Wallabies gain parity up front to allow Giteau and Quade Cooper the time and space to weave their magic? At test level I think we’ll see that Cooper won’t be the force he was in the Super 14 as he has to make faster decisions under greater intensity and pressure.

Luckily for the Australians they face the Springboks in their fortress at Suncorp stadium in Brisbane, and have two home matches against the All Blacks. They’ll have to win all 3 to have chance at the title.

Prediction: 3rd

The Springboks

Can the Springboks successfully defend their Tri-Nations title? Their June internationals were hardly convincing, but they have the

The Bulls, Stormers and Sharks super 14 sides (who make up the bulk of the Boks) showed they have the measure of Kiwi opposition, but struggled against the Australian sides. I expect the Tri-Nations to be a similar story with the Boks not intimidated by playing in New Zealand against the All Blacks, and also enjoying wins in their last 3 encounters.

Australia presents a different story. The 2 home games for the Boks in South Africa should be won easily enough, but Suncorp stadium in Brisbane, has been a bogey ground for both the Boks and the various South African super rugby sides.
Coming at the end of a 3 week road trip, it’s a game the Boks may struggle to win.

The Boks may be experimenting slightly with some new individuals, but the bulk of the squad is highly experienced, allowing the newer players the luxury of a winning environment to settle into.

That may help to offset the loss of Fourie du Preez, JP Pietersen, Juan Smith, Heinrich Brussow and
Bismarck du Plessis. Of those players only du Preez’s loss may be the one that is truly felt. South Africa does not have a similar player to replace him with, and it looks like Ricky Januarie will be entrusted with the scrumhalf berth. He’s a different player to du Preez, and it’ll mean that Morne Steyn will have most of the kicking responsibilities in general play thrust upon him.

Januarie offers a physical dimension that may pressure the opposition, but he needs to first ensure he does his primary job and deliver quick ball to his loose forwards and backline.

Unlike last year, the Boks won’t have the monster boot of Morne Steyn, but I don’t feel his loss will be felt too heavily with a more intelligent player in Zane Kirchner who offers greater stability at the back. If Peter de Villiers opts for Gio Aplon instead, the Boks will have a potent attacking weapon with greater pace. Both options give the Boks greater attacking options compared with last year.

For the Boks to win, they’ll need to start well away from home and rack up 1 or 2 wins to set up their home leg and a successful defence of their Tri-Nations title.

Prediction: 1st