Sanjay's Rugby World

Whilst the Springboks have a great World Cup record since re-admission in 1992, their lack of consistency between World Cup successes can be attributed to a lack of quality flyhalves.

Springbok flyhalf Morne Steyn

It’s possibly the most important position on the rugby field. Flyhalf.

The flyhalf directs play, provides a link between getting his forwards and backs operating efficiently, and more often than not needs to slot the goals and keep the scoreboard ticking over.

Every great side has a champion flyhalf. And where there is a champion flyhalf, their side is usually successful.

Look at Naas Botha, Grant Fox, Joel Stransky, Rob Andrew and Dan Carter. How succesful were their teams?

TOO MANY FLYHALVES

Since re-admission in 1992, the Springboks have not been able to dominate world rugby with a winning percentage like the All Blacks (about85%) because of a derth of quality flyhalves.

The All Blacks have predominantly used Andrew Mehrtens, Carlos Spencer and Dan Carter.

In that time the Springboks have used Joel Stransky, Hennie le Roux, Henry Honiball, Franco Smith, Jannie de Beer, Gaffie du Toit, Braam van Straaten, Percy Montgomery, Butch James, Louis Koen, Andre Pretorius, Brent Russell, Derick Hougaard, Jaco van der Westhuyzen, Meyer Bosman, Ruan Pienaar, Morne Steyn.

That’s approximately a new flyhalf every season!

THE COMPLETE FLYHALF

There are some interesting names there, with some fairly talented players, others predominantly there for their kicking, whilst others lacked much kicking ability.

Again if you look at the All Black names mentioned, all could play the running game, and kick fairly consistently and successfully.

Why does South Africa struggle to produce complete flyhalves?

Outside of Hennie le Roux, and Morne Steyn, I don’t believe we have had many ‘complete’ flyhalves (and even then many would disagree with me!)

I believe it’s because in South Africa we have relied too heavily on big, bulky forwards that can win penalties and played a conservative game plan where a kicking flyhalf is adequate.

We don’t like to take risks, and for that reason we have tended to discard the Franco Smith’s, Brent Russell’s and Ruan Pienaar’s. Even at a local level, the likes of Chris Rossouw, Morne Steyn (when Derick Hougaard was around), Meyer Bosman, Earl Rose etc have failed to consistently get opportunities at flyhalf.

SPRINGBOK PROBLEM

Confidence players like Gaffie du Toit, Brent Russell and Ruan Pienaar have never been given the opportunity to develop their kicking skills to become the complete flyhalf. (Don’t forget Percy Montgomery took many years at international level before he gained his phenomenal accuracy).

If the Springboks lose Morne Sten, who is our backup? Butch James? Ruan Pienaar? Neither inspire much confidence for me.

Within South African rugby we have potential backups. Peter Grant is currently plying his trade in Japan (but will be back in 2011), and possibly the most talented backup for me is Burton Francis who is another to be given few opportunities when he could have already had a massive impact at the Lions.

Outside of these players we have young potential in Patrick Lambie, Elton Jantjies, Lionel Cronje and Francois Brummer. But they need time, experience, and a chance to prove themselves at international level via Super Rugby.

I just hope they are persevered with and given the chances they need to shine. Continually going back to players like Willem de Waal will never produce the type of rugby to continually make South Africa successful at the top level!

Just what is Chiliboy Ralepelle capable of? We never see enough of him to be able to guage how good he is!

Chilliboy Ralepelle

In the 2009 international season, Ralepelle played 56 of a possible 400 minutes.

In 2010 that figure has risen to about 205 of a possible 720 minutes. These figures are greatly inflated compared to what they most likely would have been given an injury to John Smit against France, that also gave Chiliboy greater time against Italy.

With some great hookers around such as Bismark du Plessis, Tiaan Liebenberg and Gary Botha, does Chiliboy deserve to be the Springbok reserve hooker? And just how good is he?

These are questions that are hard to answer.

Chiliboy was undoubtedly a talent when first selcted by Jake White in 2006.

Having represented SA Schools, South Africa under 19′s and under 21′s, Ralepelle was probably always destined for bigger things.

However being selected as the youngest ever Springbok captain for the 2006 fixture against the World XV was not fair on the player.

Since that time Ralepelle has rarely had the chance to play more than a handful of games as a starting player at any level.

Sure he probably could have had more game time with the Bulls, but how can he be continuously selected for the Boks when we don’t know what he is capable of? Without form in Super Rugby or the Currie Cup, he is selected for the Boks based on his promise more than his past performances.

In this year’s international season, Ralepelle has shown he is capable of some great moments. His defence has been good, he has made some vital steals and his lineout throwing has been solid.

But how good is he under pressure? How effective is Chiliboy as a ball carrier. How many tackles does he make/miss on a consistent basis?

These questions I am not sure of because he doesn’t play often enough.

I would suggest Ralepelle should be at a Union that gives him consistent game time at Super Rugby and Currie Cup level. Only then will we know how good he is, and whether he deserves to be a part of the Springboks.

Chiliboy Ralepelle Fact File

Full name: Mahlatse Ralepelle
Born: September 11, 1986, Tzaneen
Age: 24 years 14 days
Position: Hooker
Height: 5 ft 10 in
Weight: 222 lb
Represented: Pretoria Boys High, SA Schools
South Africa Under-19, South Africa Under-21
Springboks
Teams: Blue Bulls, Bulls, Springboks
Test debut: South Africa v New Zealand – Pretoria, Aug 26, 2006

Recently major South African rugby sponsor has come out criticising the lack of black players in the ABSA Currie Cup.

They certainly have reason to complain, as do the South African rugby public. However the problem does not lie solely with the Currie Cup coaches.

Unless there is black talent at the lower levels, how are coaches supposed to select black players?

Most of the black players still come from the coastal regions, and we should be asking why the highveld unions are failing to produce players of black colour as the problem lies within the junior structures.

South African Rugby Players Association (SARPA) chief executive Piet Heymans said “Saru should be creative with the competition structures and see if there is a way of making the transition from junior to senior level easier. The bigger provinces should also be more willing to loan players they aren’t using to smaller provinces. It is happening already, but the system can be utilised even better.”

“It does not help for SARU to criticise the provinces. As governing body of rugby, Saru have the ability to do something about the (transformation) issue. The question is just whether the leadership is strong enough to really do something about it” said Heymans.

With changes to Super Rugby, the structure of South Africa’s domestic competitions is being reviewed, with the Currie Cup and Vodacom Cup likely to be changed.

One possibility is to make the Vodacom Cup an under-23 competition, with more of a focus on the development of players. (This may occur from 2012 onwards as the competition will remain the same in 2011).

Whilst that would be a good move, there has to be a buy in from coaches and they have to be surrounded by black talent so they are not scared to give them opportunities.

It is a concern that outside of wing and prop, there are not many black players coming through at the higher levels. If they exist at junior level, where do they go?

I’m not sure why it takes a sponsor to highlight this issue, surely this is an issue SARU should have at the top of it’s agenda?

The Southern Kings represent just one area that SARU can show it is serious about transformation. Given the fact they are non-committal in their development, I wouldn’t expect to see much change very quickly however!

SANZAR have promoted Super Rugby (Super 15) as a better, more interesting rugby product that will improve on the Super 14.

Fan reaction has not been as positive, with results of a survey by Superbru highlighting the fans concerns. Super 14 was a good rugby package, yet SANZAR had to freshen their rugby product to please television bosses.

Only 13% (SA), 19% (Aus) and 18% (NZ) felt the changes were made to create a better product for fans, with greater revenue being seen as an important reason for the changes.

If you have not done so, you can still take part in the Superbru Super Rugby survey.

Whilst the majority of the 6400 respondents came from South Africa, there was representation from Australia and New Zealand as well with a fairly consistent pattern of results.

Whilst SANZAR say’s this about Super Rugby “It’ll be bigger, better and the best yet”, only 25% of South Africans, 29% of New Zealanders and 53% of Australians say that the new Super Rugby will be better than the Super 14.

The majority agree that whilst the Super 14 was flawed, this is not the right solution.

My concern is that rather than putting rugby’s best interests at heart, SANZAR has selfishly catered for Australia’s needs (only).

1. The Extra Change

Between 63% (SA) – 89% (Aus) were in favour of, or at worst indifferent to, the expansion to 15 teams.

However the reaction was decidedly different between the 3 countries on whether Australia deserved 5 sides.

I don’t believe Australia can support 5 sides, especially with a side coming out of an area (Melbourne) which has little rugby infrastructure.

2. Fewer Non-domestic games

Only 7% of South Africans said they liked the fact that there will be fewer non-domestic games, with sides missing out playing 2 international sides.

A whopping 53% said this move was bad for the tournament.

3. A longer season

With 3 further league games, and a probable extra play-off game, only 21% (SA), 22% (NZ) and 56% (Aus) were in favour of the longer season.

This is probably due to both South Africa (Currie Cup) and New Zealand (ITM Cup) having domestic competitions that I fear will be killed at the expense of Super Rugby, whilst Australia only has club rugby and will benefit from a longer Super Rugby season.

It also means sides will have to have larger squads, and rotate their players more. Is this fair to fans who expect sides to field their strongest lineups?

Interestingly 69% of Australians think the changes will be good for the Wallabies, but only 30% (NZ) and 26% (SA) think they will have a positive impact on the All Blacks and Springboks respectively.

4. More domestic rugby

Teams will be playing their fellow countrymen twice now, and 65% (SA) 50% (NZ) and 38% (Aus) are disappointed that half the games will be local derbies.

Where did SANZAR get their information that fans wanted more local derbies? Probably from the fact that these games bring in most of the gate takings?

Only 26% (SA), 32% (NZ) and 45% (Aus)enjoyed the fact that half the games will be local derbies.

59% of South Africans prefer local matches to be the focus of the Currie Cup. 63% believe this move will be bad for the Currie Cup.

I believe it will signal the death of the Currie Cup as we know it. It’s sad given that young South African’s have grown up wanting to get their hands on the coveted Currie Cup, and that may not be the case any longer.

5. Finals structure

The new finals structure ensures that at least 1 side from each country will qualify for a new, confusing finals system.

24% (NZ), 27% (SA) and 46% (Aus) were in favour of each country having 1 side qualify for the finals, regardless of their position in the context of the entire table.

A large number of South Africans and New Zealanders don’t like the move, believing it is unfair and designed to help attract audiences.

Unsurprisingly the Australians differed on this view, as a similar finals structure exists in their other codes which in my view reward mediocrity and make the whole purpose of a long round robin season pointless.

Full Superbru survey results

The Lions showed they are on the improve and making a late run for the semi-finals as they beat the Sharks 22-20 at Ellis Park.

The Lions have proven they can much closer to the major unions by improving their defence. In fact if their goal kicking had been better in these crucial matches they’d have been so much better off.

It shows that players such as flyhalf Elton Jantjies can get a lot better as they gain more experience.

Lions skipper Franco van der Merwe scored a late try to seal the win, and may have been fortunate as he possibly came up short and the try was not referred to the TMO.

However the Sharks were favoured when Lwazi Mvovo put a foot in touch for his second try.

The Lions deserved their victory, whilst the Sharks have shown they are still beatable as we head towards the semi-finals.

The Blue Bulls accomplished their mission in beating the Leopards 39-26 on a sand field in Potchefstroom, however it came at a cost with injuries to Juandré Kruger (hand), Gary Botha (ankle), winger Jaco van der Westhuyzen (knee), prop Werner Kruger (knee) and Fudge Mabeta (neck).

With a crucial game against Western Province coming up, the Bulls will be hoping these aren’t serious.

In the Friday night games, Western Province beat Griquas 48-32, whilst the Cheetahs beat the Pumas 59-24.

Province have shown they are dangerous when they get it right, but have been a bit hot and cold this season, whilst the Cheetahs have shown they know how to put the second tier sides away easily. This may help them if points difference comes into the final calculations.

Springbok captain John Smit had surgery on a cervical disc earlier in the week, meaning he won’t captain the Springboks on their end of year Grand Slam tour.

Springbok Captain John Smit

Springbok team doctor said, “This was not a career-threatening injury. The surgery was done to ensure the disc did not get progressively worse.

“It will also ensure John’s availability for the Springboks and the Sharks for the 2011 season” said Roberts.

Smit will now undergo a prolonged period of rehabilitation and conditioning for the 2011 rugby season.

This follows news that Smit has recently extended his contract with the Sharks, and will stay with them for the 2011 season.

However it opens doors for both the Springbok hooking position, and a new Springbok captain (given that Victor Matfield is also unlikely to tour).

SPRINGBOK HOOKER

As far as the position of hooker goes, Peter de Villiers is unlikely to call up and new players with Bismarck du Plessis, Chiliboy Ralepelle and possibly Bandise Maku all Springbok tourists under his regime already.

We’ve seen that once de Villiers has selected a player, they are very hard to leapfrog. This is despite the fact that outside of du Plessis in the Super 14, Ralepelle and Maku have had barely any consistent rugby this year.

Tiaan Liebenberg is currently injured, and Gary Botha has had recent injury problems too, but both deserve to tour with the Boks as they have been the form hookers in South African rugby this year.

Ralepelle is not able to make the impact with ball in hand that Liebenberg and Botha can make, or even Maku for that matter.

We know that de Villiers is unlikely to ever start Ralepelle or Maku in a major test match, would he not be better off to see what Liebenberg and Botha can offer him?

NEW SPRINGBOK CAPTAIN

Juan Smith looks likely to lead the Springboks at this stage.

Smith has leadership experience with the Cheetahs and is an inspirational player who leads by example, both on and off the field.

“It will obviously be a huge honour to lead the Boks. I don’t want to just lead by words” said Smith.

“I believe this year’s tour will be an exciting one if (Springbok coach) Peter decides to rest certain of his players. With a year to go before the World Cup and young blood getting a chance, the players will be determined to challenge for places (beyond New Zealand in 2011).”

“We have enough depth in all the positions (should players get the chance to rest) and cannot offer that as an excuse.”

Former Bok flank André Venter summed it up nicely when he say’s Smith has the qualities to make a success of the Springbok captaincy.

“Juan will have the respect of his fellow players because of his uncompromising play. You can only be successful as captain if you have the respect of your team-mates. He is a certainty for the Bok team” said Venter.

If Smith is as successful as I know he can be, it would leave the Springbok coach with an interesting dilemma ahead of the 2011 Rugby World Cup. If John Smit could not clearly show he deserves a spot ahead of Bismarck du Plessis, should Smith be the new Springbok captain to defend the Boks World Crown?

Incumbent Springbok fullback Francois Steyn has criticised the lack of respect shown by Springbok coach Peter de Villiers, and indicated he no longer wishes to play for the Boks under the current coaching staff.

Francois Steyn played the last 2 test matches against Australia at fullback for the Boks, an indication he is rated number 1 in the position ahead of Zane Kirchner and Gio Aplon.

His availability for the Boks this season has not always been a guarantee, as his Frnch club Racing Metro obviously have concerns with how he is treated.

It appears Steyn still wants to play for the Boks, but is willing to forgo national duties if the Springbok management does not act in a professional manner.

Springbok coach Peter de Villiers was meant to travel to Paris to meet Racing Metro and discuss Francois Steyn.

“He was supposed to come to Paris on September 18. He cancelled the meeting. It’s not the first time he has done that. It’s a lack of respect for Racing Metro, a lack of respect for me” Steyn told French rugby paper Midi Olympique.

“I don’t expect anything from the Springboks anymore. I have moved on.”

Steyn has possibly closed the door on selection and participation in the 2011 Rugby World Cup, with his stance and comments.

“It is too soon to say that I will not be there (Rugby World Cup). But it is certain that I will accept Racing’s decision. You play the World Cup to face the best players in the world” said Steyn.

Whilst I don’t rate Steyn highly as a player and don’t believe he deserves to be in the current Springbok set-up, his treatement as a player is shoddy.

Francois Steyn is obviously frustrated, and for a player who just recently highlighted how important the Boks were to him, it hits hard at the organisation of the national side.

It also highlights the circus that the Springbok management are running, and gives further evidence that Peter de Villiers is not the right man for the job!

Griquas and Springbok winger Bjorn Basson has signed for the Bulls, joining them on the 1st November.

Griquas and the Cheetahs have allowed the winger a release a year early on his contract, a move that financially rewards the union with a transfer fee, even though they are sad to see such a talented player depart.

Griquas CEO Arni van Rooyen said, “Bjorn has signed his contract and is a Blue Bulls as from 1 November. Bjorn is a very good player and the Bulls were very professional in the manner that they approached us to negotiate with him. We don’t want to lose him but rugby is a business and the decision was the best for all parties concerned. He is one of the best finishers in the country.”

The Bulls had been looking to bolster their wing resources, especially given Akona Ndungane’s recent horror run with injuries. Ndungane’s contrct expires at the end of this season, and it will be intersting to see if his contract is renewed.

The Cheetahs Lionel Mapoe was also considered, as was Sharks wing JP Pietersen, but his asking price is believed to have been 3 times that of Basson.

The Bulls will now regain the pace they’ve been lacking since Bryan Habana’s departure. Basson is a real speedster with great aerial ball skills which will help with the Bulls kick chase tactics.

It compliments Gerhard van den Heever on the right wing who is a more creative and skillful winger.

I look forward to Basson excelling in Bulls colours, as he has the pace, skill and attitude to be a huge success. Ironically I actually believe he will ease the pressure and allow van den Heever to shine next year as well.

It will be a joy to watch the Bulls wings scoring tries again which have been sadly lacking in recent weeks in this year’s Currie Cup!

Speaking exclusively to Keo.co.za, Nick Farr-Jones has been critical of current Springbok coach Peter de Villiers.

“He’s so unpredictable and controversial. You have to think that he’s a liability to South African rugby. At Test level you need a coach who is measured, composed and intelligent in his dealings with the media. De Villiers hasn’t displayed those qualities consistently enough” said Farr-Jones.

“That undoubtedly heaps pressure on your captain (John Smit) and a team takes their emotional cues from their leader. That situation needs to be addressed as a matter of urgency.”

The problem is that Farr-Jones is not on his own. Former Wallaby hooker and Fox Sports commentator Brendan Cannon called de Villiers a “Clown” on national television in Australia during the away leg of the Tri-Nations, and wherever de Villiers goes, he is creating controversy and tarnishing the Springbok image.

Surely this has to be a concern to SARU?

As a member of the South African rugby public, I find it concerning. Whilst our performances on the field are very important, our conduct off the field in representing the country with dignity are also important.

Nick Mallet was fired for comments far less controversial than de Villiers. And under Louis Luyt or even Rian Oberholzer I doubt de Villiers would be allowed to act as he does. Does Oregan Hoskins have any balls at all because ultimately isn’t he in charge?

Even Minister of Sport Makhenkesi Stofile has said, “Goodness man! Get yourself a spokesperson! Even I don’t always understand what he says.”

PLAYERS TOO OLD?

Farr-Jones also believes that if the Springboks don’t introduce younger blood, they might pay at the 2011 Rugby World Cup.

“South Africa’s primary strength in 2007 was the experience of their group. Now some of those players are looking to be carried out in coffins.”

“I suppose one argument could be that they’ve earned the right to retire on their terms. But there needs to be some honesty in their personal assessment of their contribution. Every player gets to the point where they have to ask themselves some tough questions about their ongoing value to the side and some of the senior boys are at that place now. I was there and I know just how hard that can be.”

“But I’m not sure they’re being completely honest in those assessments, and if they carry on until the World Cup South Africa run the risk of jeopardising their campaign.”

However Farr-Jones did not cast all doom and gloom, saying there was still time for the Boks to make the necessary changes required to defend the World Cup.

“Twelve months is sufficient time to gel a side for a World Cup,’ he said. ‘The introduction of young players injects freshness and positive unpredictability into a side, and the Springboks could do with those qualities.”

“In 1990 we [Australia] made fairly significant changes to our squad and we went on to win the World Cup. I can’t see why the Springboks cannot employ a similar strategy to their benefit.”

With emotions running high after the Springboks produced one of their worst ever Tri-Nations campaigns this year, SARU president Oregan Hoskins has called for calm ahead of the season review with Springbok coach peter de Villiers.

Hoskins denied De Villiers was being treated differently from previous coaches when dealing with his off-field behaviour.

“He is being treated no differently to his predecessor who was also reviewed at the end of some indifferent Tri-Nations campaigns.”

Whilst many Springbok supporters have reached the end of their tether with de Villiers and want him sacked, Hoskins has talked of making rational decisions, and gave the example of a similar situation in 2006 when Jake White was coach.

“All rugby followers are extremely disappointed with results in the Tri-Nations, as are the Springbok team and management, of course. We take the situation very seriously, but there is a process in place and we will follow that through” said SARU president Oregan Hoskins.

“Four years ago many people thought the answer was to sack Jake White and we resisted those calls. Four years on and we have to review all our options once more.”

“A few years ago SA rugby was lambasted for changing coaches too frequently and throwing players away. Now we have consistency we have to guard against it becoming a tyrant in our selections” said Hoskins.

Reading between the lines, de Villiers will not be sacked. At most he will be given a stern talking to, and possibly recommended consultants who can come in and help him out, but SARU will not replace him, even though he has let his country down on and off the field.

Whilst trying to console himself with the fact that White had a terrible season in 2006, the year before the 2007 World Cup, Hoskins is obviously hoping de Villiers will come right for the 2011 Rugby World Cup the same way Jake White did.

Hoskins is banking on the experienced Bok squad firing when it matters most and is not concerned the squad will be “too old”.

“Just in general terms it’s interesting to note that youth is no indicator of success at Rugby World Cups. The English team that won in 2003 had 13 players of 30 or older in their squad and Australia had eight in 1999.”

“If we took all the currently contracted Springboks to the Rugby World Cup next year there would be only six of 30 or older” said Hoskins.


Can de Villiers do a “Jake White”?

He certainly has the players, but I’m not sure if he has the nous.

This year de Villiers has shown he is dogmatic and stubborn to the detriment of focusing on the “controllables”. He constantly gets into trouble off the field, deflecting away from the job at hand and heaping even more pressure on his captain who just needs to focus on his rugby.

His selections appear biased and whilst experience and loyalty are commendable qualities, I fear we are ignoring many talented players in South Africa who deserve their chance and could add great value to the Boks (e.g Brok Harris, Tiaan Liebenberg, Gary Botha, Deon Stegmann, Duane Vermeulen)

In saying that, I believe de Villiers can win with the squad he has largely settled on. However it’ll require tough decisions (with regards to resting players), more focus and discipline, and a fair bit of luck!

Let’s just hope de Villiers can do a “White”!

Griquas beat bottom of the table Leopards 29-20 in Kimberly, but it was not a clinical nor impressive display from the home side who have started their end of season decline earlier than previous seasons.

Western Province were impressive in demolishing the Pumas 62-10 in Nelspruit. Central to their resurgence has been their Springboks, with Jean de Villiers, Juan de Jongh and Gio Aplon providing the spark and ‘x’ factor to get Province scoring freely once more.

The Sharks have often had a tough time against the Cheetahs, but dominated in all aspects as they showed they have the depth minus their Springboks to go all the way this year.

The big clash of the round belonged to the Bulls and the Lions at Loftus.

In a match where both the goal kickers struggled, and put pressure on their side, the Bulls were the ones to build a lead with two well worked tries in the second half.

The Lions came back strongly, but resolute defence was enough to see the Bulls hold on for victory and move into third place and in all likelihood a semi-final position.

Here is my choice for the Springbok Grand Slam Tour  – by Ahmed Zuber

I prefer running the ball and a lot of emphasis on the break down area.


This would be my starting line up:

15. Riaan Viljoen (brilliant, watch him run great vision and a huge boot )

14. Bjorn Basson

13. Jaque Fourie

12. Juan de Jong

11. Luwazi Mvouvo (great defender and very creative on front foot ball, will be a great boost to his confidence)

10. Frans Steyn (yes something different, with his huge frame and vision, he will ask quetions)

9.  Rory Kockett ( it’s about time )

8. Willem Alberts (very reliable )

7. Ashley Johnson (will make a brilliant fetcher, he has the speed and strength and he loves to mix it up at the breakdowns)

6. Juan Smith

1. Tendai Mtawarira

Reserves

16. Chiliboy Ralepelle

17. John Smit (play him at prop)

18. Victor Matfield

22. Elton Jantijes


Other squad members

Bryan habana (is not being coached to his strengths , I still think he has a lot more to give, with a lesson on stepping of both feet, he will keep the opposition guessing, play him at inside centre, with right coaching, you’ll see a different Habana)

JP Pietersen

Kegan Daniels (fetcher no 7)

Andries Bekker

Danie Rossouw (no 6,8 or 4)

Rugby World Cup 2011 (RWC 2011) today announced kick-off times.

I’m not sure how it is constantly marketed as the World’s 3rd largest sporting event, but kick off times have only just been announced.

CEO for Tournament Organisers Rugby New Zealand 2011, Martin Snedden said “We have achieved a good balance . If New Zealand is to make the most of the platform RWC 2011 gives us to showcase our country to the world, then we need to ensure we maximise the global television audience for key matches”

This means that kick off times are determined by global television audiences rather than what will ensure the 2011 Rugby World Cup produces the most spectacular rugby.

Ten of the 48 matches will be played in the afternoon including the New Zealand v Canada pool match.

A further 12 matches will begin by 6pm and another seven at 7.30pm.

Eden Park, will host the Opening Ceremony on Friday, September 9 starting at 7.30pm and followed by the opening match between the All Blacks and Tonga at 8.30pm.

13 matches will start at 8.30pm and the semi-finals and final won’t start until 9.00pm!

Surely that is crazy? The dew in September and October will still be a factor in New Zealand, and surely crowds and the television want to see the best conditions for rugby which have to be during daylights hours?

To be dicated by the audience numbers in the northern hemisphere once again highlights how rugby is dictated to by the power of the dollar, and not what is best for the game!

Full list of Kick-off times

Article reprinted courtesy of Sharksworld.

Original article at http://www.sharksworld.co.za/2010/09/16/your-chance-to-own-a-limited-edition-black-and-pink-sharks-jersey/

It’s black. It’s pink. It’s for a seriously good cause and there are only 110 of them in existence. Exclusively on Sharksworld, we give you the chance to bid for a limited edition replica black and pink Sharks jersey!

Sharksworld has managed to secure a number of these jerseys and will be using an auction system to sell them to the highest bidder. We bought them off the Sharks at R1 000 a go, of which R200 has already been given to CANSA. We’re counting on the generosity of our visitors, though, to raise a wee bit more than that, though and our guarantee to you, the bidder, is that we will make no personal profit whatsoever from the sale of these jerseys and will donate all proceeds above the purchase price to CANSA.

A thousand bucks for a replica jersey? That’s a bit steep, isn’t it? Well, yes, I guess it would be if it were any normal jersey. Remember, though, that this is a limited edition item and you’ll be owning something of which there are only 110 in existence. As a keepsake, a rarity, or something simply to display over your bar with pride, this is a must-have item for any Sharks fan. Collectors of rugby memorabilia in general will also want one, knowing that it’s bound to increase in value over the years.

Above and beyond all else, though, we’re raising money to fight cancer, a disease which I’m sure has affected many of us in one way or the other. I have lost a grandfather and an uncle to this awful disease just in the last year and am committed to doing whatever I can to improve our understanding of how to fight it – as well as supporting victims of the disease and their families.

So here’s how the auction is going to work. We’re setting a reserve price on the jersey of R1 200, which will cover our input cost, allow us to cover shipping to a destination of your choice within South Africa, as well as provide a (small) additional donation to CANSA. We’re obviously hoping to raise considerably more than this, though and again are encouraging you to bid generously on this must-have item.

So, the starting bid will be R1200. Thereafter, bids will increase by R20 at a time. In order to place your bid, you need to be a registered user on Sharksworld and you need to submit your bid as a comment on this thread. The auction will run until 3pm South African time on Friday (17 September) and we will close the thread to further comments at that stage.

We will contact the winning bidder by email on Friday afternoon and that bidder will need to transfer the money into our (South African) bank account by 10am on Monday morning (20 September) in order to secure the jersey. Failing that, we will offer the jersey to the next highest bidder and if they also can’t pay (shame on you!), we reserve the right to cancel the auction.

International bidders are also welcome, but need to understand the following additional conditions:
- The price will still be in Rand and we will agree on an exchange rate after the auction closes.
- You will need to pay us via PayPal.
- You will be liable for international shipping charges over and above the sale price.

Right, I think that’s about enough for now. Get bidding, peeps! We’re keen to raise some serious dosh for a seriously good cause. Black and Pink – it really matters.

To make a bid contact the awesome team at Sharksworld and take action to raise money for a great cause and own a great piece of sporting memorabilia at the same time!

Gio Aplon has signed a three-year deal with Western Province until the end of 2013.

Gio Aplon

He has signalled his intention to remain in the Western Cape and Springbok rugby after the 2011 Rugby World Cup which is great news for Western Province.

With Joe Pietersen’s departure earlier this year, I am sure WP rugby will be thrilled to retain his services and allow time to build their depth at fullback especially where there is not a lot of experience other than Conrad Jantjies who has only recently returned to top level rugby.

Springbok eighth-man Pierre Spies will stay a Bull as he has extended his contract with the Bulls Rugby Union until October 2012.

The 25 year old said it was an easy decision to stay with the Bulls at Loftus despite receiving numerous offers from elsewhere in the country and abroad.

Spies who was born and bred in Pretoria, has represented the Blue Bulls since his primary school days.

“I have received numerous offers from abroad and other local unions, but it was quite easy to make this call” said Spies.

“The quality of the players around me, the fantastic management structures and the achievements we have recorded all contributed to my decision. It is very important in life to set high goals and this team does just that. I also came through the structures and want to remain part of it for a while longer”

“Now I can focus without any worries on doing what I am getting paid to do and play rugby to the best of my abilities” Spies concluded.

Just how much this decision has been weighing on the 37 test veterans mind is anybodys guess, but he has not been on his best form since the Super 14 concluded.

ENGELS TO JOIN KINGS

The signing of Spies comes just days after prop Jaco Engels announced he has signed with the Kings commencing at the end of this season.

His value to the Bulls was highlighted even as recently as the match against the Sharks where he scored a superb individual try. Engels has played over 50 times for the Blue Bulls in the Currie Cup and 40 times in super rugby.

The Namibian born 30 year old front ranker has signed for the Eastern Cape franchise for the next two years, having played for the Southern Kings against the British and Irish Lions in 2009.

“They are trying to build something special and I would like to contribute. I will always treasure my time with the Bulls, but I respect their structures and realise it is time for the next generation to come through the ranks. I still have something to offer though and will be proud to add value to the Kings” said Engels.

BULLS COACH HAPPY

Bulls coach Frans Ludeke was understandably happy to retain the services of his outstanding loose forward, Spies.

“It is a huge honour for a union if someone of Pierre’s stature and talent finds himself comfortable in their environment and structures. He is a world class player and also adds a massive amount off the field. We are very happy to retain his services” said Ludeke.

Of Engels, Ludeke wished him well for his future career.

“He will remain an important member of our squad for the rest of the season and I don’t have any doubt about his commitment to our cause. We understand why he is moving on and wish him well” said Ludeke.

SARU have “sold out” South African rugby, bowed to the Australians’ needs and forgotten to look after their own stake holders, the South African Rugby public.

I have maintained that the new Super Rugby competition (super 15) benefits Australia immensely, and offers very little for South Africa.

The chairman of SARU’s Executive Committee, Dr Jan Marais is not fooling anybody when he claimed the Currie Cup reamins a top priority for SARU, remains the crown jewel for South African rugby, and they will never allow it to be ‘watered down” by other competitions.

“For those people who think it is all about money, if you compare what we receive from Sanzar to the income from the television rights for the Currie Cup, the Currie Cup brings in 87.5% in comparison to the Sanzar money. The Currie Cup is always a priority because the Sanzar money is for Super rugby and the Tri Nations” said Dr Marais.

“The season has been extended for the Super 15 from next year, but we will still have a top class Currie Cup on the go. Traditionally the Currie Cup has been played while the Tri-Nations is on and the Boks have returned later. This won’t change under the new format.”

INCREASED LOCAL DERBIES

Dr Marais then explained that the new Super Rugby competition will benefit South African rugby because of the increase in local derbies and decrease in travel requirements.

“In terms of viewership and attendance figures, we have traditionally had more fans at the derbies than at games against overseas teams. The fact that we now have a double round of these are good for the game as a whole.”

“Taking it further, we will be playing our rugby in South Africa most of the time and teams will only have to go overseas for four weeks. That is also better as it is less than the teams travelled in this year’s Super 14 competition.”

We have been told that we will have more local derbies because that is what the fans want.

Certainly crowd figures would support that, but it is my opinion that most South African fans (and players) prefer the Currie Cup to remain in it’s current format, with all the top players playing. Having the Boks return for just the playoffs demeans the competition and denies the players the chance to experience a competition that means so much to them.

CURRIE CUP FORMAT AND LACK OF PLANNING

Dr Marais has hinted that the format of the Currie Cup may have to change, and with the limited window it has to operate in; after the Super 15 and during the Tri-Nations, yet before the end of year tours, that may be stating the obvious.

After 19 Super rugby matches, up to 9 or 10 internationals, and a further 4 to 5 end of year internationals in the northern hemisphere, when would SARU expect the Boks to play any Currie Cup matches?

Sports scientists tell us the players need more rest time, and the top players would surely have to rest during the less presigious competitions. Surely that means that the Boks are unlikely to even play any Currie Cup matches at all?

“We are looking at a few possibilities at the moment, and these will have to be debated by the unions themselves as to what the best would be for the competition” said Dr Marais.

Should these debates not have taken place before SARU agreed to a Super 15 structure?

Once again it shows the lack of foresight and planning by SARU.

This sort of incompetent administration would never have taken place under Louis Luyt who always ensured South Africa never compromised its values to accomodate the Aussies and Kiwis.

In fact under the shrewd Luyt, South Africa reaped greater rewards from the Super 12 and Tri-Nations than Australia and New Zealand.

Meanwhile Dr Marais said, “The deal will benefit all of us. We get the same share of the money as the other two partners and our players get top class competition. The benefits are the same for all three partners.”

The benefits are not just financial, and sacrificing the Currie Cup for meaningless Super Rugby games is not a benefit in my view.

IS IT ONLY ADMINISTRATORS THAT ARE HAPPY?

Whilst we can’t expect too many administrators to criticise what they have agreed to, they would do well to heed the criticism of the players, coaches and fans.

Former Springbok coach Jake White makes some great points that the Super 15 doesn’t address the desires of the rugby public to bring back tours and provide a freshness to the rugby season.

“Between the Currie Cup and Super 15, teams can now play one another five times in a year. From a financial point of view the derbies probably make a lot of sense. Those are the games that attract big crowds locally” said White.

“It’s a huge game when the Bulls play the Cheetahs. But I don’t know whether the excitement and crowd attendances will be the same in the second or third year when the teams play one another five times in a year”

“As a country we said some time ago that we should bring back tours partly because we play the same people every year. But now we are doing exactly that with our local competitions, we are playing even more against the same people.”

“With long international tours you can play against different opponents every year, expose young players to the Springbok culture without handing out Bok colours, and overall it’s just good for rugby” explained White.

New Zealand’s All Blacks have extended their lead at the top of the latest IRB world rankings, increasing the gap on Australia and South Africa.

By winning their last Tri-Nations match against the Wallabies 23-22 at the ANZ Stadium on Saturday, the All Blacks ensured they have opened a massive gap on the rest of the field, and created further humiliation for the Springboks.

Over the course of the Tri-Nations, the Springboks have plummeted by 4.24 points to 3rd spot, being overtaken by the Wallabies. The All Blacks meanwhile gained 3.09 points, and the Wallabies 1.15.

Considering just how dominant the Boks were last year, it is an embarrassment that the Wallabies are even close, let alone ahead of the Boks.

Top 20 IRB world rankings:

1. New Zealand 94.77

2. Australia 85.56

3. South Africa 85.22

4. France 82.75

5. Ireland 82.03

6. England 81.82

7. Scotland 79.81

8. Argentina 79.70

9. Wales 78.58

10. Fiji 74.39

11. Italy 72.97

12. Samoa 72.74

13. Japan 72.49

14. Canada 69.43

15. USA 67.86

16. Tonga 67.06

17. Georgia 66.38

18. Russia 65.80

19. Romania 65.10

20. Namibia 62.69

In August 20009, the Springboks were the dominant side in World Rugby. Like Roger Federer, they have struggled over the last 12 months and appear to be losing the battle against their opponents.

Roger Federer recently lost his US Open semi-final against Novak Djokovic. What amazed me was the remarkable similarities this great athlete shares with a champion side, the Springboks. And it has more to do with just the South African connection (Federer’s mother is South African).

Both the Boks and the “Fed Express” are highly talented. Both have the best records ever in their respective sports (if using the criteria of World Cups and Grand Slams), yet both remain highly competitive for large periods, but just don’t seem to have the polish to win any major titles.

Federer has lost his aura that allowed him to win matches before even entering the court. Similarly, sides have worked out the Boks and no one is scared of their physicality any more, knowing if you match the Boks up front, you are more than likely to win.

It’s no co-incidence their arch rivals (Rafael Nadal and the All Blacks) have overtaken them, and are dominating their sports.

GAME PLANS AND FITNESS

The game plans of Federer and the Boks are to dominate their opponent and lead early, and they struggle to come back once falling behind.

Federer used to be the best conditioned athlete on a tennis court. He now struggles to dominate his opponents physically, and if a match is taken to five sets he is more than likely to lose (such as the US open 2009, 2010 and any match against Rafael Nadal!)

The Boks have always prided themselves on their strength and fitness. In the last 18 months, the scrum has not dominated sides (and at times gone backwards at a rate of knots such as against Saracens) and teams have managed to beat the Boks by playing for 80 minutes, even on the highveld!

Both the Boks and Federer were at the top of their game 2-3 years ago, enjoying the number 1 rankings in their sports. 2010 has seen both slip, the Boks are now 3rd, and whilst Federer is 2, he has slipped to 3 and may do so after the US Open.

THE LACK OF A COACH

With the amount of talent Federer and the Boks possess, I can’t help but wonder why they aren’t dominating their peers.

Both have the worlds at their feet, but where their opponents have caught up, figured out strategies to nullify their strengths and put the pressure firmly on theses champions, they have not responded under pressure.

Both are in denial, and have been unwilling to admit their shortcomings.

Perhaps it comes from the lack of guidance and coaching both use. It’s no secret the Boks enjoy a lot of input and control from their senior players. Defeat after defeat, Springbok coach Peter de Villiers refuses to acknowledge there is any problem.

He has even gone so far as to say after the defeat to the All Blacks at Wellington this year, he does not know what more the Boks had to do to win. They lost that match by 12 points!

Federer has largely gone through his career at the top without a coach. When he’s winning it’s not a problem, but when he is being outhit from the back of the court, who is there to tell him he needs another string to his bow?

Both the Boks and Federer need a decent coach. There is so much raw talent there. It’s a tragedy that neither are playing to their potential, in some ways basking in the glories of their achievements from yesteryear.

THE FEAR OF FAILURE

However there is another reason I believe both these parties are failing on the world’s biggest stage.

The fear of failure.

To win, I believe you have to risk losing.

Federer is the most talented tennis player I’ve ever seen. He can do it all. But he is prone to errors, and whilst he has the best all round skills, he is not the strongest or hardest hitter on the ATP tour.

When faced with someone with nothing to lose, who is prepared to go for his shots such as Juan Martín del Potro in the 2009 US Open final, or Djokovic in the 2010 semi-final, Federer lacks the courage to change tactic and try something different.

He has the skill to play the serve volley game which would give him easy points, and keep his opponent guessing as to his tactics.

If he wants to add to his career game slam titles, and re-gain his world number 1 ranking, I believe he’ll have to add some more strings to his bow.

The Boks similarly have the talent to play any game they want (just look at the Bulls and Stormers as examples). Persisting with a negative kick chase game all the time takes the element of surprise out of their attack.

If it fails to deliver, the Boks struggle.

The Boks have such talented backs, but rarely ever use them in space. It doesn’t mean they have to play away from the strength of their forwards, but what is the use of having the Habana’s, Aplon’s and other silky runners if they are just there to make tackles?

THE FUTURE

It is a critical time for both the Springboks and Roger Federer. 2011 will be a critical year in determining whether they will be known as one of the all time greats, or a shooting star that is starting to fizzle out.

I hope both produce the results I know they are capable of. To do so, they’ll have to back their ability and go for the win rather than playing it safe!

Springbok hero Bryan Habana seems remarkably out of form, and even had to endure being booed by the crowd in Bloemfontein during the match against the Wallabies.

Springbok wing Bryan Habana

Was it fair for the crowd to treat their hero with such contempt?

Whilst I don’t agree with the booing of our national treasures, I can understand where the frustration comes from.

HABANA’S DECLINING STRIKE RATE

From 2004 to 2007, Habana played 36 test matches and scored 30 test tries for the Springboks. (Including 12 times in 2005, and 13 in 2007).

Habana also equalled the try-scoring record at a Rugby World Cup as he dotted down 8 times (sharing the record with Jonah Lomu who set the record in 1999). This culminated in Habana being named the 2007 IRB Player of the year.

From 2008 to until the end of this year’s Tri-Nations in Bloemfontein, Habana has played 30 matches and scored 8 tries. (Only twice in 2008, 4 times in 2009 and twice this year).

Clearly there is a problem!

HABANA’S PROBLEM

A point I’d like to make is that the difference in strike rate also co-incides with 2 different coaches (Jake White and Peter de Villiers).

Whilst I believe neither Springbok coach Habana has played under has utilised his full talent, under Peter de Villiers it is more a result of an attack that is lethargic and impotent across the entire side.

There is also a loss of form, and wingers are often confidence players who like to enjoy ball in hand, and crossing the tryline. This lack of confidence is sure to transgress to all areas of Habana’s game.

Former Springbok wing Pieter Hendriks believes Habana’s confidence has dwindled as a result of rushing in on defence which has seen his flank exposed and targeted by the opposition.

“He will still beat any opponent in a one-on-one situation, but when last did he get such an opportunity” questions Hendriks.

“I think the fact that he is caught in no man’s land so often on defence is undermining his confidence. In the beginning he was excellent at shooting up and intercepting balls, but opponents have done their homework and it’s now working against him.”

Hendriks offers the following advice to Habana.

“Forget about that technique. Work hard at staying on your opponent’s inside and take your opportunities in normal game situations. His team-mates should also do more to get Bryan in space. He remains one of the deadliest finishers in world rugby” said Hendriks.

IT’S A TEAM PROBLEM

I believe Hendriks hits the nail on the head by saying Habana’s team-mates need to get Bryan in space. It is a team sport, and Habana should simply be the finisher of Springbok attacking play.

Whilst I am not as blase as Peter de Villiers who when asked about Habana’s form after the Loftus test said “He missed one ball and slipped. I don’t think there is a lot to be worried.”

I am more worried that our centres don’t create opportunities for our wingers and fullbacks who should be scoring more tries.

And if any of our top players lose form or need a rest, we have the depth in this country such as Gio Aplon, Jongi Nokwe etc if coaches are prepared to give others an opportunity.

Until the coach addresses these issues and produces a Springbok side that plays to its potential, can scores tries and get our heroes in the limelight again, crowds will boo the Springboks.

After all the crowd pays good money to see their heroes. They deserve a better return on investment!

Habana’s try scoring record (and matches) by country:

Argentina 2 (3)
Australia 5 (12)
British and Irish Lions 1 (3)
England: 6 (8)
Fiji 0 (1)
France 4 (6)
Ireland 1 (2)
Italy 3 (4)
New Zealand 3 (14)
Samoa 4 (1)
Scotland 3 (4)
Tonga 0 (1)
Uruguay: 2 (1)
USA 2 (1)
Wales 2 (5)